Facebook exec says Facebook more powerful than countries

So what’s this got to do with armstrongism you ask?
When you have one man in charge of so many lives, what could go wrong?

Author

  • James

    The Worldwide church of God attempted to annihilate peoples personality, individuality, will, and character. The stranded souls that hitched their wagon to this organization unknowingly supported a power-hungry pharisaic and fastuous authoritative cult leader and his son, Garner Ted Armstrong. For all the alarums and excursions, the fact remains that without knowing it, we nurtured these two ungrateful incubi's. For that I can only ask for forgiveness. After my WCG experience, I went to college to educate myself so I would have a greater understanding of the world about me and to understand why I ever fell for HWA's scam religion. This lead me to the conclusion that the appropriate action to take, in my judgment, is to provide people with opportunities to learn, develop, and exercise their potential as human beings, by freeing them from men who exploit and abuse them. This website and others are my vehicle to do just that.

    View all posts

One Reply to “Facebook exec says Facebook more powerful than countries”

  1. It may not have occurred to many of our readers that Herbert Armstrong was no conservative. He was a leftist progressive, looking to usher in a future world government with Draconian measures to tightly control the lives of those who were not the elite. He, of course, pictured himself as the elite — as the new senior partner within this dictatorial tyrannical system of a closely controlled society where the Proles have no power and don’t actually own anything.

    In style, if not substance, he was himself a type of Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey. Ambassador College was the Google of its day — gathering secret data on users of the service, controlling what people said and did, shadow banning and outright ejecting dissidents who differed in their expression.

    Meanwhile — and behind the scenes — the elite lived corrupt lives, living off of the substance of the hard working — being as it were, among the most corrupted, unethical and immoral while insisting that their subjects live according to much higher and impossible to achieve standards, hampered as they were by having effectively 50% of their net income stripped away from them.

    Nevertheless, Herbert Armstrong was a mere millionaire. He wanted to be a billionaire. He wanted to live in the heady space occupied by the ‘important’ of the world. In that he failed. At best, he was a joke to them. They used his ego to extract as much as they could from him. As the liberals do, he just gave away $100,000 to leaders who never needed his money, hoping to buy favor from them, hoping to feed his narcissism.

    He was no different in concept to the current crop of elites, just poorer.

    The problem was that people were taken in by this grifter con. He formed his own echo chamber of daft narratives and lived on the mostly innocent binging on his daft insanities. They lived for the promise of things to come, while Herbert Armstrong stripped them of their future to create his own lavish present.

    As Khan said in Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan, “Nothing ever changes”. He was wrong, of course.

    It’s gotten worse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.