Mussing’s by Ralph Haulk.
In the mainstream paradigm of Christianity, God is a waste of time. Heâs a worse form of enslavement than the mess weâre trying to escape now. Many realize that âGodâ is the originator of our present confusion.
 Biblically, He is, and He says so in Isaiah 45:7.
“I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.â
Â
 The Jews have no problem with this idea. They realize Biblically the Satan is merely a servant doing Godâs will, as stated in the book of Job.
As we see in Matthew 4 and Luke 4, Satan is in charge of all world government. If he promoted a government âunder Godâ, he wouldnât be lying, since he serves Godâs purpose. But he is the actual mediator between government and God.
2 Corinthians 11:13:
| âFor such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. |
| 14Â And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. |
| 15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their worksâ. Notice how Satan works from control of world government. His offer to Jesus was simply for Jesus to bow and serve him, and Jesus could bypass the suffering in store. Jesus gave the logical response (assuming, of course, that there truth to the story). Jesus said we should serve God, and Him only should we serve. Human government and religion, therefore, can be ignored. Thatâs basically what John 1:12-13 tells us. We can choose to be born into the family of a recognized sovereign, no longer subject to man. Couldnât be any plainer or more direct. As long as you hurt no one intentionally and refuse to compensate them, government has no jurisdiction over you, since government jurisdiction is limited only to vengeance. What is happening is that the masses are intentionally, deliberately, being deceived, and God is ultimately responsible. The solution, the definitive truth, is that there is no need to follow men at all, as Jesus plainly told us. You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. As long as you harm no one, you are free. From this POV, acceptance of Godâs sovereignty is acceptance of your own sovereignty before men. Thatâs why the highly educated are brainwashed into thinking they can make the world better if they have the biggest mob. Of what use is God? Part 2
Letâs have a good look at the key section of the Declaration of Independence:
     âWe hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happinessâ-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governedâ.
Why did the United States government form?
The answer is obvious: to secure the unalienable  rights coming from God. Any power not geared to that goal is not a just power.
 It stands to reason that majorities, in and of themselves, are meaningless for the purpose of making laws. No majority, for any reason, can violate plainly listed absolute rights coming from God. If they do, the individual is free to absolutely ignore them, because they are not securing unalienable rights coming from God.
So where are these unalienable common rights listed? Thatâs easy; from the commentary of Blackstone on common law, listed in the section, âThe Absolute Rights of Individualsâ.
 What Jefferson stated in the Declaration of Independence was merely a reference to the common law of England.
 Blackstone lists the rights as being of two sorts.
âNow the rights of persons that are commanded to be observed by the municipal law are to two sorts; first, such as are due from every citizen, which are usually called civil dutiesâŚâ
 Civil duties. Blackstone defined civil law as originating from the Catholic Church, calling it a law of âPopes and emperorsâ.
 The Constitution is a civil law, minus the Popes and emperors. It is a law listing civil obligations, and congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is a law devoid of religion.
ââŚsecondly, such as belong to him, which is the more popular acceptation of rights or juraâ.
 This is where Magna Carta takes authority, based on common law rights of men.
âPersons also are divided by the law into either natural persons, or artificial. Natural persons are such as the God of nature formed us: artificial are such as created and devised by human laws for the purposed of society and government; which are called corporations or bodies politic.â
A natural person is such as the God of nature formed us. Thatâs thinking, breathing, self aware humans like you or me.
 âAll men are created equalâŚâ
 Natural persons as natureâs God created us.
 Then there is the artificial person, devised by human laws for the purpose of society and government, called corporations or bodies politic.
 If they are created by humans for the purpose of society, what is the purpose of society? Obviously to secure rights coming from God. Thatâs what Jefferson plainly wrote. That, beyond doubt, is their purpose.
âFor the principal aim of society is to protect individuals in the enjoyment of those absolute rights, which were vested in them by the immutable laws of natureâ.
 Corporations and bodies politic have as their âprime directiveâ the responsibility of preserving the absolute rights of human individuals. Humans have these rights by the âimmutable laws of natureâ.
 You will notice that Jefferson writes of nature and natureâs God, a clear separation between corporations, bodies politic, humans.
 By common law, American Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that corporations are neither persons nor citizens, but a means to an end. What end? Preserving the absolute rights of human individuals. Marshall didnât say that, but common law does. No action of corporations or bodies politic can violate the absolute rights of human individuals.
 Corporations are products of civil law, and the Constitution is civil law, not common law. Civil law states the duties and responsibilities of people and corporations toward others, but the common law states the absolute rights of individuals.
 The Constitution cannot grant rights or list rights, and the Federalists understood this. They challenged the idea of the Constitution listing absolute rights, for the simple reason it would grant absolute jurisdiction.
 The common law named the absolute rights of individuals, while the Constitution named the civil obligations of individuals toward each other.
 This separation of rights and power is correctly listed in the 9th and 10th Amendments.
 The rights listed in the Constitution do not eliminate other rights (common law) retained by the people.
 If an act is not listed in the Constitution or prohibited to the states by the Constitution, it remains with the states respectively, or the people.
 The 9th Amendment deals with rights. The 10th Amendment deals with powers. In no case does Constitutional power interfere with or abrogate rights, which remain under jurisdiction of common law.
 SCOTUS has told us in six different cases it has no jurisdiction over common law. Common law jurisdiction is retained by the states.
 Corporations are not recognized by common law without the kingâs permission, and we have no king.
 Corporations were condemned by Adam Smith in âWealth of Nationsâ as being incompatible with free enterprise.
 By law, therefore, corporations have no recognition as persons since they are not recognized by common law, and they have no part in free enterprise. Their purpose is to recognize the absolute rights of individuals
|
