For some, the very mention of the word, or even the date, gives rise to those old Armstrong-induced feelings of aversion and apprehension. Itās the Woe of Woes, to hear some talk about it. Itās that time of the year when they have to be extra careful not to slip into sin by singing along with those catchy Christmas hymns that range anywhere from praising Christ to telling the tale of a reindeer that used to be laughed at and called names by the other reindeer. To have to stand before God on judgment day and acknowledge this evil would be a horrible fate, indeed!
Itās also that time of the year when they have to have the appropriate response ready on the tip of their tongue for those who wish them a pagan Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. An appropriate response might be āThanks.ā But to say, āSame to you,ā or āYou too,ā would be a sin, they feel. Small words. But one must be very careful with these things, for after all, eternity hinges on moral decisions such as these, they reason.
Most of us, however, having escaped Armstrongism and its attendant errors, have rejected the above attitude toward Christmas, which most of us previously held, and have managed to retrain ourselves and allowed our bruised emotions to heal. Most of us now more or less eagerly anticipate the arrival of this season. Or at the very least, we no longer dread it.
I think we all now realize that there is nothing inherently wrong with Christmas. In fact, what was inherently wrong was our underutilized thinking and analyzing skills. Herbert Armstrong sold us a bill of goods regarding the evils of this day; and for most of us, it meant a 180 degree turn from our previous attitude toward it. Iām sure Herbert was pleased that he was able to present us with some fairly plausible reasons why we should jettison the observance of this day, as this could serve as another wedge to further divide us from orthodox Christianity, and from our neighbors and relatives. The more we relied upon the WCG to be our all-in-all, the less likely we were to ever depart. As an added benefit, not keeping Christmas freed up more of our household funds to feed the insatiable coffers of the Church.Ā
While some of those still in the clutches of Armstrongism may not be terribly vocal when it comes to arguing the merits of the old covenant vs. the new covenant, etc., when it comes to Christmas (and Easter), they come alive; feeling certain that, at least in this area, they can nail our hides to the wall. As someone in one of the split-offs recently responded, when I suggested that they were stuck in a time-warp in the old covenant; āAt least we donāt believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny!ā As if what these two holidays are all about is defined by these two fictional creations; and that anyone other than a child would ever believe in them! As far as Santa and the Easter Bunny are concerned, none of the healthier churches that I have attended since the WCG have even so much as mentioned them in their services or in their church activities. I think they realize that they only detract from the credibility of the gospel.
The Christmas issue is probably one of the hardest areas for many former ex-COGers to take a confident stand on. Where does one go to research the moral aspect of this subject? Thereās not a whole lot written on it as itās not much of an issue with most groups, other than a few such as Worldwide and its split-offs. Various encyclopedias cover the history of some of the secular aspects of Christmas, but none delve into the moral and spiritual aspects of its observance.Ā
After the changes in Worldwide in 1995, Mike Feazell, at a Bible study during the feast of tabernacles that fall, answered questions posed by the members. He covered the topic of Christmas, and did a very commendable job of it. Keep in mind that doctrinally most of us have no dispute with the WCG, as they are āright onā in most doctrinal areas and have provided some very valuable insights into many areas that we were once deceived about. I realize that we have no use for Worldwideās authoritarian structure and abusive practices, but most of us would have to admit that they often can and do give us more insights into areas where there have been doctrinal changes than anyone else. I have found that on this subject, the WCG has shown itself to be a very good resource.
Following is a transcript, somewhat edited/revised for brevity and flow, which I made from tapes I acquired while still attending the WCG. It covers the excellent points that Mr. Feazell made regarding Christmas at the feast Bible study, and begins with his reading of this question from the audience:
āI understand that under the new covenant, the Sabbath and holy days are not what save us; yet does not God abhor the modern carryovers of the Canaanite festivals, such as Christmas? If so, how can the use of these customs not be worship of God in vain?āĀ
OK, thatās a very good question (Mr. Feazell replies). First, letās go to Deuteronomy 12, verses 28 to 31, where itās mentioned. It says here, āBe careful to obey all these words that I command you today, so that it may go well with you and with your children after you forever, because you will be doing what is good and right in the sight of the Lord God.ā Of course, heās talking about the place of worship here, from back in verse 14, and about all the offerings and responsibilities for the sacrifices of the Levitesā¦and so on.Ā
Then he comes into verse 29, and he says, āWhen the Lord your God cuts off from before you all the nations which you go to dispossess, and you dispossess them and live in their land, take care that you are not snared into imitating them, after they have been destroyed before you. Do not inquire concerning their gods, how did these nations worship their gods, for I also want to do the same. You must not do the same for the Lord your God, for this abhorrent thing that the Lord hates, they have done for their gods. They even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods. You must diligently observe everything that I command you, do not add to it or take away from it.ā
First of all, letās understand a few things. Weāve used this to condemn Christmas and Easterā¦I think most Protestants donāt like Halloween much, so thatās kind of out of the picture anyway. But Christmas and Easter; weāve used traditionally this passage to condemn the daylights out of them, and we say, āOK, these are pagan festivals, and therefore theyāre wrong for us to keep.ā Now let me hasten to say, the church has already made it plain the church does not keep Christmas and Easter. We already have a Passover and Unleavened Bread celebration, in which we celebrate the death and resurrection of Christ.Ā
More recently, we focused more on the resurrection aspect than we used to, which is what Easter is about. But with Christmas, what we have said is that members who keep Christmasā¦thatās up to them. Now, thatās very hard for some, because they say, āWell. OK, what about this passage?ā Now we as a church donāt keep Christmas, but we donāt condemn members, or tell them that they may not or should not, nor do we say they should or must. Thatās something that members can make their own decisions about. Now I know that some members would find that so abhorrent and so gross and abominable that they wouldnāt even consider it. Others see it differently. Now, weāll talk about that as we go through this question and other questions coming up.Ā
First of all, letās take a look at what weāre actually being told here in Deuteronomy 12; in verse 2, we can get some specifics. āYou must demolish completely all the places, where the nations you are about to dispossess served their gods. On the mountain heights, on the hills, and under every leafy tree, break down their altars, smash their pillars, burn their sacred poles with fire, and hew down the idols of their gods and blot out their name from their places. You shall not worship the Lord your God in such ways.ā Now, if we studied these ways, weād find that they had different kinds of practices around their altars, but did Israel have altars? Well, they had an altar, didnāt they? So it isnāt the altar thatās being talked about here, for after all, there was an altar involved in the way Israel was to worship God.
āSmash their pillars.ā Now the pillars had to do with a certain kind of magic, incantations, and so on; of certain expectations that they had of their gods, and these gods had to respond to these pillars in certain ways.
āHew down the idols of their gods.ā Well of course idolatry, bringing God down to the level of an idol, was preposterous and absurd.ĀāDemolish these places.ā They worshipped up on these mountain heights, and on hills and high places.
āAnd under every leafy tree.ā They had certain worship practices going on in connection with leafy trees. And we can look at that and say, āHa! That looks like a Christmas tree!ā But leafy trees and Christmas trees are quite different, so it doesnāt quite fitā¦Ā
āYou shall not worship the Lord God in such ways, but you shall seek the place that the Lord your God will chooseā¦bringing there your burnt offerings and your sacrifices, your tithes ā¦ ā Now why did these people worship on high places, and under leafy trees? ā¦ Because they thought that the gods were territorialā¦they were gods of certain placesā¦. Now God did not want Israel worshipping him that way. Why? Because that would indicate that he is a god that is confined to some placeā¦But God was getting across to Israel that he is the God of everything. Heās not confined just to Israel. He does good things for other nations, too.Ā
Thatās why you notice in wording, like in the 10 commandments, it says, āYou shall have no other god before me,ā as though thereās such a thing as other gods. āNo other god before me.ā In other words, the point that heās making at this point in time is that even if there is another god, heās greater than they are. Heās not confined the way they are. Furthermore, they worship their gods in all kinds of goofy ways. They believed that they could get their gods to have to do stuff for them. Thatās what magic is all about. Thatās what incantations are all about. They believe that the gods are inconsistent, that you never know what they are going to do, that they get angry for no reason.Ā
So in order to appease their anger, like over in the volcanoes in Hawaii, you have to throw someone into the volcano, and that appeases the anger. Youāre always having to go around walking on eggshells, worrying about who did what, to appease the gods, because if the Nile rose too high, then the gods were mad. If there were storms or lightning, the gods were mad. They believed there was a meta-divine realm, impersonal, above the gods. And that if you put the bones in the right order, and you said the right incantations, and you made the right kind of smoke and powder, then that would make this meta-divine impersonal force to cause the god to do the thing you wanted it to do.
Now, can you see why God said, āDonāt start worshipping me like they worship their gods.ā? āIām not like that! You go and worship me in the place I tell you. Iāll tell you where to worship me; Iāll tell you where the festival is going to be; Iāll tell you what youāre going to do on it. And then, Iāll give you the crop. Youāre not going to make me do anything. Iām not compelled by anyone. Iām going to make a covenant with you. Hereās the deal. You act good, you do what I say, and Iāll bless you. You donāt ā I wonāt.Ā
āIn fact, Iāll kick you out of the land. Iāll let all of them come in and take it. Do what I say. Youāre going to live right. Youāre not going to be abominable like they are. They throw their babies in the fire to get their gods to do what they want them to do. They go get under a tree, and have all kinds of sexual activities, in order to promote their crops growing. I donāt operate like that. Your crops grow because I make them grow, because I want to.ā
Also, what we have to look at is that God is not telling Israel not to do anything that the pagans did. The paganās prayed. God is not saying not to pray, just because pagans do. He isnāt saying donāt offer sacrifices, just because pagans offer sacrifices. He isnāt saying donāt have a temple, donāt have a tabernacle. In fact, the tabernacle was patterned much the same as the pagan tabernacles, which also had a sanctuary, and a holy of holies. The pattern for temples is about the same.Ā
That wasnāt the kind of thing God was driving at here. Obviously they had priests. Pagans had priests. Israel had priests. It was a priesthoodā¦.It wasnāt that Israelite was being asked not to do anything the pagans did at all. Sometimes we get that thinking going, and then all of a sudden anything that the pagans did, we canāt do. Well, pagans, you know, did a lot of things we do. I imagine a lot of you have wedding rings on. Thatās pagan. It doesnāt mean anything pagan to us today, but originally it was a pagan kind of a thing, in fact it had some sort of religious significance. It doesnāt today. Meaningless to us today. Weāre not worshipping the devil or bowing down to false gods or anything else by having a wedding ring. Itās merely a custom. Itās become that. Thereās no pagan worship involved.Ā
Wedding ceremonies. I imagine a lot of you had a brideās maid. Iāll bet a lot of you probably had a best man at your wedding. Thatās pagan ā did you know that? Do you know where that originated? That had to do with the āevil eyeā that would always be out to get the newlywed couple, and so you had to have some stand-ins so that the evil eye would not know which one to go after, and might go after one of them instead ā¦ Iām serious! Now, we do that today, and it means something completely different, doesnāt it? That old custom is obliterated, passe, Thereās no religious significance at all. Itās just a matter of having your best friend there to support youā¦ Totally different meaning. And yet it originated in paganism. There are some people who wonāt have a wedding ceremony for that very reason.Ā
I remember a big controversy in the church about throwing rice. Thatās why we started throwing confetti. You think Iām kidding! Throwing rice was a sin. Why? Because rice is prolific. Itās a fertility symbol. So if you throw rice, it means āhave lots of kids.ā And so, therefore, we must not throw rice at our wedding ceremonies. I know that when I was a kid, that was a big deal in the church. Anybody remember that? So, confetti was OK. Substitute rice, you know, fake rice. You canāt have any kids with that! No problem with confetti.Ā
But you see the point. You can get hyper, go overboard, begin to make everything into a big pagan symbol. Remember when we couldnāt wear paisley ties as it was apparently some kind of pagan symbol. Then there was heart-shaped jewelry ā that was supposed to be pagan. You can think of all kind of things. Some people in the church felt that you couldnāt wear any type of jewelry with an animal, like a little horse, or a little butterfly on it, as that was making an idol or graven image. Breaking that commandment. Thatās what the commandment says! Youāre going to take off your jewelry now, right? But itās talking about bowing down and worshipping, making it to worship.
Now, I donāt know anyone that worships their jewelry. A lot of these things are born out of a desire to be very careful in obedience to God. But sometimes they go overboard. And then they begin to impose things on other people ā then they begin to judge people. Then they begin to call people names. Then pretty soon big divisions occur, because theyāre doing this, and weāre not. Weāre pure. And instead of realizing that our ugly heart has risen up and begun to condemn our brothers, we get worried about these little things insteadā¦..Ā
You can worship God in vain in a lot of ways. The issue is idolatry. The issue is worshipping false gods. The issue is one of bowing down to idols and of having all kinds of worshipful practices that do not recognize the true identity of God, of Jesus Christ, of who he is and what heās done. So if some of your brothers in the church have a Christmas tree, and you get offended at that, you might ask yourself a few questions. Are they worshipping that Christmas tree? Are they worshipping it? Because thatās the issue. Do they bow down to it? Do they worship it? Do they pray to it? I donāt think so! I donāt know anyone who does that. Now, maybe somebody does, somewhere.Ā
Now, we go back to AD 300 or 400, and we say that Christmas originated back then. First it was a Saturnalia celebration. And people were worshipping a big Roman god, Mithras, the bull god. OK, I ask you this. Does anyone worship Mithras today? ā¦ People donāt worship Mithras today. People donāt have Saturnalia celebrations today. Why not? Because Christianity obliterated the worship of Mithras and Saturnalia. Obliterated them. Theyāre gone. Theyāre a page in the history bookā¦Christianity wiped it out. Some people donāt look at it this way, but look at it the way we always did, and the way Jehovah Witnesses do, which is to say itās a compromise with paganism. After all, the pagans worshipped their gods during this period of time.Ā
Then the Christians came along, and they said, āOK, from now on, weāre not going to worship Mithras any more, weāre not going to celebrate Saturnalia; from now on weāre going to celebrate the entrance into the world of the Son of Godā¦ā But the fact is, history shows that that worship was wiped out, and today, people during Christmas think about one of two things, in general terms. They think about either the birth of Jesus Christ ā is that bad? I donāt think so, I think thatās good ā or they think about a big fat party, is that good? That all depends.Ā
Now, one of the ways we used to condemn Christmas up and down was to say ā in fact, some of our own literature said ā āWell, people donāt really think about Christ at Christmas in this country, all theyāre thinking about is what presents are they going to get, and theyāre thinking about whether theyāre going to get enough presents for other people, and get in a mad rush of purchasing stuff, and getting all the cards out. A lot of them are thinking about the office party, and who they can neck with in the back room by the coffee machine, and slipping vodka into the eggnog, and all that kind of thing. People getting drunk, and more wrecks happen during the Christmas season, and more family disputes.ā But thatās because families get together and thereās more opportunity for disputes ā do you notice that at the feast at all?
So we focus on the secular aspects of Christmas, and say that not many people are thinking about Christ during this time anyway, and how ridiculous that is, and how nobody thinks about Christ because theyāre thinking about all this other stuff. OK. But what if they are thinking about Christ? Letās take the argument the other way. Thatās a nice way to try to condemn the season, and it justifies our position. But what if they are thinking about Christ? What if they do go to church on Christmas, and listen to a sermon about the birth of Christ where all these birth narratives in Matthew and Luke are read, especially the one in Luke. Where they read about how the angels came rejoicing and proclaimed the Son of God was born, and sang, and so on. Whereās the sin in that? Think about it. Whereās the sin? Are they worshipping the devil? Are they worshipping an idol?Ā
No. Theyāre reading the scriptures, theyāre remembering that God fulfilled his promise given through all the prophets to send his son. Theyāre singing songs about the birth of Christ and the entrance of the savior into the world, just like the angels did in Luke 2. Whereās the sin in that? Weāve got to ask ourselves that. Now, weāve had that as sin for so long. I mean you drive down the street, and what Iād tell me kids was the same thing my parents told me ā my mother told me, my dad wasnāt in the church ā Iād say, āLook at those Christmas decorations. Oh, they look pretty, donāt they? Oh, yes. But thatās how the devil deceives you, with those beautiful lights, to make you think itās good, when itās really very bad.ā OK, whereās the sin? Letās be honest. Are we worshipping a false god?Ā
āBut he wasnāt born on December 25th, Mr. Feazell! Donāt you know that?ā Where do the scriptures say that? How do you know that he wasnāt? āWell, the shepherds wouldnāt have been out in their fields in the winter time.ā Really? Have you ever been to Israel in the wintertime? Iāll bet, if you went to Israel in the wintertime, you might find out that shepherds could be in the fields in the wintertime. Put that in your historical pipe and smoke it! Iām sorry, but thatās true. Letās go further. How do we know he wasnāt born December 25th? Does it matter when Christ was born? No, it doesnāt matter. Is it a sin to celebrate his birth?Ā
Now, if you donāt know when it was, why is December 25th worse than any other day? āWell, because it used to be a pagan holiday.ā You know, virtually any day used to be a pagan holiday. Pagans did all kinds of bad things all the time. Now, if we went back and we looked at everything the pagans used to do on every day, I think that we wouldnāt be able to do much praying on any day. You canāt pray on a day when pagans used to pray? You canāt worship Christ on a day when pagans used to worship a false god?Ā
So, 364 days you may worship the Lord your God, but not on December 25th! Donāt pray, donāt go to church whatever you do, donāt think about the birth of Christ on that day, and definitely donāt read scriptures. And whatever you do, donāt sing songs about it. Thatās so stupid, isnāt it? But thatās what we said. Is it OK to think about Jesus Christ on Christmas day? And talk about the birth of Jesus Christ with the family? Letās look at Romans 14 in this connection. It talks about judging others. Thatās what weāre good at. Weāre good at judging each other. Weāre not the only ones. All Christians seem to be awfully good at that. Thereās a whole chapter devoted to it right hereā¦.
āSome judge one day to be better than another, while others judge all days to be alike.ā Now, we could go round and round about what he (Paul) is referring to here, but one thingās for sureā¦heās trying to tell us something about judging each other, about how we look at certain things. One of those ācertain thingsā is about days. āLet all be fully convinced in their own minds. Those who observe the day, observe it in honor of the Lord.āOK. If youāre going to observe a day, observe it in honor of the Lord. If you decide to keep Christmas this year, do it to the Lord. If you decide not to keep Christmas this year, or any other subsequent year, thatās fine.
Because, he goes on to say, āThose who eat, eat in honor of the Lord. Since they give thanks to God. While those who abstain, abstain in honor of the Lord, and give thanks to God.ā So two people can do opposite things on something, and both do it to the Lord, and it can be an issue that you have to be warned not to judge each other about. But you need to do it to the Lord. There was one question here that said, āAre we going toā¦or, Iāve heard a rumor that people might keep Christmas as long as they do it āto the Lord,ā in quotes, and I presume that it was a little bit pejorative, and I understand that.
But yeah, thatās what Paul says. Make sure you do it to the Lord. Now, if you get drunk, youāre sinning. If you worship the Christmas tree, youāre sinning. If you commit fornication, youāre sinning. OK? Thatās where the sin lies. So maybe mistletoe is kind of a lousy custom for Christians. Maybe thatās one of the things thatās been carried over that kind of stinks. Maybe Christian homes ought not to have mistletoe, at least if they do, they ought not to have it in the way that where you get underneath it and you kiss so and so. Thatās a pretty lousy custom. I think it is. I think that you could probably think of a few others.
āWe do not live to ourselves, and we do not die to ourselves. If we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord. So then whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lordās. For to this end Christ died and lived again that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living. Why do you pass judgment on your brother or sister? Or you, why do you despise your bother or sister? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written, as I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bend to me, every tongue shall give praise to God.ā So then, each of us will be accountable to God. āLet us therefore no longer pass judgment on one another, but resolve never, instead, to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of another.ā So here comes a responsibility.
If youāre sitting down with somebody that you know has trouble with bacon, or might, it wouldnāt be very thoughtful to order it in front of them, would it? On the other hand, if youāre having bacon, it wouldnāt be appropriate for everybody in the restaurant to search you out, to find out whatās on your plate. You know, craning necks, and looking around corners, āI wonder what theyāre ordering.ā Thatās over thereā¦they didnāt do it up your nose, nor should we do it up someoneās nose.
āI know, and I am persuaded, that in the Lord Jesus, nothing is unclean in itself.ā But it is unclean for anyone who thinks itās unclean. So youāre dealing with a conscience issue. If your brother or sister is injured by what you eat, youāre no longer walking in love. Letās not let what you eat cause the ruin of one for whom Christ died. āSo do not let your good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not food and drink.ā Powerful statement. āBut righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. The one who thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and has human approval. Let us then pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.ā Listen to that. āAnd not for the sake of food destroy the work of God. Every thing is indeed clean, but it is wrong to make others fall by what you eat.ā
Now, thatās a two way street then, isnāt it? So we donāt go out and try to seek out and make it our business to find out what everyone else is doing so that we can find a way to judge them. On the other hand, when we suspect that there might be a problem with someoneās conscience about something, we donāt do it up their nose. We donāt stick our Christmas tree up their nose.
What have we learned from reading the above, and from a general analysis of the subject? I think we have learned that the answer to the controversy over whether Christmas is evil or not can be boiled down into the following two points:
1. In observing Christmas or any other ādays,ā we need to put that observance to this litmus test:
Are the people bowing down to idols and are they having all kinds of worshipful practices that do not recognize the true identity of God, of Jesus Christ, of who he is and what heās done? I think we would be hard pressed to find anyone who uses Christmas or any other day to worship anything other than God and Christ. Therefore, the observance of Christmas appears to go against no injunction in the Bible
2. If youāre going to observe a day, observe it in honor of the Lord. If you decide to keep Christmas this year, do it to the Lord. If you decide not to keep Christmas this year, or any other subsequent year, thatās fine. Itās a personal choice. But donāt judge others who do or do not keep certain days, as there is an injunction against that in the Bible.
So, should Christmas be adored ā¦ or abhorred? Probably a better way to phrase the question would be, āSo, should we observe Christmasā¦ or avoid it?ā I think that it is readily apparent that none of us should scorn Christmas, or those who observe it. And if we decide to observe it ā well and good. But whether we choose to observe Christmas or not is strictly a personal matter. In either case, no sin is involved, as long as our intent is to please God, and we arenāt judgmental of others regarding how they observe it.
Till next time, hereās whistlinā at ya! ;o)
-The Whistler