There are evangelical Christians whom I love and respect. Nonetheless, itâs time to face this: The military-evangelical complex is not just politically dangerous; itâs a corruption of the Judeo-Christian tradition and thus of Western Civilization itself.
Definition
Letâs start by defining this clearly: The military-evangelical complex is an intricate partnership between the US government and thousands of churches, typically evangelical. These churches support and glorify government-authorized violence. Their messages to their members are clear: To enforce laws is noble and righteous; to bleed on a foreign battlefield is godly; the US military is a great force of goodness upon Earth; America, manifested especially through military action, is Godâs special tool.
Every American past high-school age should recognize this description, but to be clear, here are a few exemplary images:
- It is announced in church that Johnny has joined the military. He is asked to stand and is heartily applauded by all.
- Memorial Day church services (or Veteranâs Day or July 4th) feature dedicated sermons and proud displays of flags and uniforms. There is effusive praise for soldiers, casting them as godly heroes.
- Military-themed ceremonies are held before every major sporting event.
- Children are encouraged to choose âserviceâ as a life plan; if not in war, at least enforcing state laws.
- Enacting violence on behalf of the state is certain to get you public praise and pats on the back.
- Government-ordered violence is prejudged to be good and right.
- Funerals include the ritual touching of flags by military veterans.
- Churches promote slogans like, âJesus died to save us; soldiers die to keep us free.â
- Rituals of saluting flags, singing anthems, and thanking soldiers for âserviceâ are obligatory.
Now, letâs be honest about this. Military service has become a sacrament in these churches; soldiers are the new missionaries, and wounded soldiers are the new martyrs.
And letâs be honest about something else: If we found records of such things in ancient inscriptions, weâd define them as the rituals of a military cult⊠and we would not be wrong.
How Did This Happen?
It happened because it was the easiest thing to do.
Christianity, however, was never meant to be easy. Not only did early Christians risk serious persecutions, but Jesus had warned them that âall men will hate you for my sake,â that they would be persecuted, and that they would âsuffer for righteousnessâs sake.â A follower of Jesus is supposed to lead mankind âinto the light,â thus angering those who remain in darkness. (âHe that dwells in darkness hates the lightâŠ.â)
Most Christians, however, donât want to suffer and donât want to be hated. On top of that, leading mankind into the light is hard work. Alternatives to such things â easier ways â have always been popular.
And so, joining with the state â the biggest and most powerful entity â is the safest thing to do; once joined, no suffering and no hatred are required. And to gain that position, all you have to do is spin a theology that makes church-state partnership into a righteous thing.
Christians began making such arrangements just a few centuries after Jesusâs time. The Middle Ages had their versions, and modern times have theirs. And right now, among the most vocal advocates of Christianity, we have a military-evangelical complex.
And we all know what has supercharged this process over the past decade and a half: 9/11.
In a single day, people in uniforms were promoted into a new Hero caste. Minds stewing in fear skipped right past contrary facts and the lessons they had learned in the 1970s. (The Pentagon Papers, the Church Committee reports, the Gulf of Tonkin, etc.)
All of this gave Christian leaders an immediate opportunity to fill their pews and keep them full. So they jumped at it. Presently, they are clinging to it. Military leaders jumped at it too and have spent millions of dollars promoting it, notably at sporting events.
We Were Warned
There is a great deal more to say about this, and I am tempted to ramble on about the military-evangelical complex inverting the most fundamental elements of the Judeo-Christian tradition, how it turns government into an agent of sanctification, and how the Scriptures condemn it. But I shall not. Iâve made my point and I will leave it where it stands, adding only this:
As he was stepping down from the US presidency in 1961, Dwight Eisenhower warned about this. He talked about the threats of âan immense military establishment,â that it was ânew in the American experience,â and that Americans âmust not fail to comprehend [the] grave implicationsâ of this âtotal influence â economic, political, even spiritual.â
And yes, this was the speech where he warned Americans to âguard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence⊠by the military-industrial complex.â
But, like all the great warnings of history, Eisenhowerâs were flatly ignored.
It was the easiest thing to do.
* * * * *
If youâve enjoyed Free-Manâs Perspective or A Lodging of Wayfaring Men, youâre going to love Paul Rosenbergâs new novel, The Breaking Dawn.
It begins with an attack that crashes the investment markets, brings down economic systems, and divides the world. One part is dominated by mass surveillance and massive data systems: clean cities and empty minds⊠where everything is assured and everything is ordered. The other part is abandoned, without services, with limited communications, and shoved 50 years behind the times⊠but where human minds are left to find their own bearings.
You may never look at life the same way again.
Get it now at Amazon ($18.95) or on Kindle: ($5.99)
* * * * *
Paul Rosenberg
[Editor’s Note: Paul Rosenberg is the outside-the-Matrix author of FreemansPerspective.com, a site dedicated to economic freedom, personal independence and privacy. He is also the author of The Great Calendar, a report that breaks down our complex world into an easy-to-understand model. Click here to get your free copy.]