News Flash: Herbert Armstrong is Dead!

joecamel says: December 30, 2012 at 21:50 on the False Prophet Ronald Weinland blog:

  • HWA lives on inspite of your stupidity

We sort of wonder that if we were smart, would Herbert Armstrong die?

This is the very reason we need to publish this very important news flash: Herbert Armstrong is dead. No, really — he’s dead. Actually, Herbert Armstrong has been dead a long time now, something on the order of 27 years now — well over two decades, going on three.

It’s sort of like, you know, Herbert Armstrong is on an extended vacation, maybe in Argentina, along with Hitler, and he’ll return any day now and revitalize the nanocults he managed to manufacture as they split off, divided and multiplied all at the same time. Nevertheless, people seem to think he’s still alive. The United Church of God, an International Association has a picture of him and Loma up in their Head Office. Maybe she’s still alive too. We wonder what she thinks of Ramona and the $5 million divorce we all paid for. It’s sort like that Frankenstein Movie thing where Igor says, “He’s Alive!”. What does that make him now? 120 years old? Didn’t Moses make it to 120?

Any day now, Herbert Armstrong will back — alive, vibrant, vital (revived) — in full color and full of vim, vigor and vinegar (make that Dom Perignon). We expect to see him stagger up to the lectern, plowed, 5 sheets to the wind, with a cup of coffee in his hand and a donut on the Day of Atonement, and boom out, “Follow me, I will lead you into the Kingdom!”. He will personally supervise the archeological dig to unearth David’s throne so Christ can return. He will take us all to the Place of Safety and teach us there for three and one half years during the Great Tribulation, just as Revelation tells us. You know the Scripture! “And Herbert Armstrong will take God’s People into the Place of Safety, where they will be taught by That Apostle for a time, times and half a time until the Seventh Trumpet Sounds and the Lamb returns!” Blow the dust off your Bible! It’s there. Somewhere. In the inspired margins. Next to some passages you’ve highlighted with colored pencils.

joecamel seems to be continuing the fine Armstrong tradition of just making stuff up. On the other hand, we don’t:

Herbert Armstrong is dead.

This is a real shocker!

It’s been kept a secret all these years through the Great Conspiracy, started by Joseph Tkach, Senior and perpetuated by his son. They even sold off the Ambassador College properties to keep the secret alive. The grave of Herbert Armstrong is full of dumbells from the weight room of the Pasadena YMCA.

But, nevertheless, and we know this will stretch your incredulity: Herbert Armstrong is dead. Really, really dead. Doornail. Kaput. Bones and dust. And his grave is with us unto this day. There’s a death certificate. People attended the funeral. Herbert Armstrong is like, dead, man.

This is not the only epiphany we have for you.

Howard Clark suffered a spinal injury in the Korean War which left him paralyzed. His legs withered and he had to use a wheelchair. He had married the nurse who had taken care of him after his injury in the War. He had come to Ambassador College and attended as a student apparently from 1959 to 1963.

It was a year before this time that Richard David Armstrong anointed Howard Clark. Now it was the case that his legs had atrophied to the extent that it was just not possible for him to walk, but after the anointing by Richard David Armstrong, he began to strengthen and began walking shortly thereafter. Thus, Richard David Armstrong had achieved a certain amount of credibility in 1958 as a minister and son of Herbert Armstrong.

Shortly after this anointing, Richard David Armstrong suffered an automobile accident, July 23rd, 1958. It was just a week later that he died on July 30, 1958. The account of the incident is recounted at The Exit and Support Network.

Here is the account from Herbert Armstrong about his son in Volume II of his Autobiography:

During the early part of summer, 1958, Mrs. Armstrong and I had driven once more back up to Oregon, for a period of fasting and rest on one of the Oregon beaches. Dick was left in command at headquarters. In more ways than one he showed excellent executive ability and good judgment. We returned to Pasadena after two or three weeks. It was along about this time that two significant events — occurrences that would seem incredible to many — directly involved Dick. One, the birth of a baby. It was a most serious breech birth. The situation was becoming desperate, and since Dick was the ranking minister then at headquarters, he was called in on the emergency. He drove immediately to the home where the baby was being delivered. The doctor and the nurse were near exhaustion — perhaps more of hope than physical — and the mother near physical exhaustion. Of course all Dick could do was pray but pray he did, and in faith. He kept reassuring the others but the situation was fast becoming hopeless. Finally the doctor gave up hope, said there was nothing he could do, unless to take the baby by cesarean section, which the family refused to allow.

The doctor went home. The husband and the wife were counseled by Dick not to become frantic or to lose hope but to rely on God. Dick refused to lose faith. He continued to pray. And finally his faith was rewarded. The fetus turned over in the womb. The doctor was called back, and the baby was born in a normal manner. The other incident, more amazing, involved a war veteran. He was paralyzed in his back, in his legs and both arms — helpless. He had to be moved in a wheelchair. The military hospitals had done everything for him that medical science could do. It was an incurable case. He was confined to helplessness for life, and put on a life pension for special financial support. This man called for Dick to pray for him and ask God to perform a miracle, that he might be restored to a life of usefulness. This was one of Dick’s last acts. He did go to this man, and following the New Testament instruction in James 5:14-15, anointed him with oil, and laid hands on him as he prayed, asking the Eternal Creator to do what man was unable to do, and had pronounced impossible to be done. This man, a former Yale football player, was healed, and quickly restored to the full use of arms and legs and his whole body. He entered Ambassador College, and soon was climbing up and down ladders painting buildings.

The Last Baptizing Tour It was shortly after this incident that Dick was off, with an assistant, on a baptizing tour up the Pacific coast. A number of people had sent in written requests for counsel with a minister, and for baptism. At the time I was using, for an office, a very small room in what we called “the penthouse” atop the library building. The room was so small that I was having to use a small woman’s boudoir table for a desk — an ordinary business desk was too large for the room. I shall never forget, of course, how Dick came briskly running up the stairs to say good-bye. “Well Dad,” he said with cheerful enthusiasm, “I’m off on this trip.” A few days later his companion, Mr. Alton Billingsley, called me on the telephone.

Tragedy Strikes “Mr. Armstrong,” he said in a voice that signaled even before his words that something was very wrong, “We’ve had a terrible accident, and Dick is in very critical condition.” Quickly I asked for all of the facts. The accident had occurred a short distance north of San Luis Obispo, which is about halfway between Los Angeles and San Francisco, on the Coast Highway. It had been a head-on collision. Both our men had been thrown completely out of the car. The right third of our car had been virtually sliced clear off. Dick had been sitting in the right front seat — often called “the death seat” — and had he not quickly moved to the left he would have been killed instantly. As I learned later, they were driving north on the Coast Highway 101, after having baptized a man that morning. As Mr. Billingsley was driving, Dick had opened his briefcase and was checking his list of people to visit planning their next few stops. They had been on a dual highway — one way traffic only on each side of a divided highway, with a short space in between. The divided highway had ended but somehow neither of them had noticed it. A half block or so to their left was another paved road running parallel to theirs, which Mr. Billingsley noticed, supposing it to be the other two lanes of the divided highway. Assuming that they were still on the divided highway with only one-way traffic on their two lanes, they were driving on the left lane to pass another car. Suddenly, from over a slight hilltop, came another car in their lane heading directly toward them. At this precise second they were almost past the car on their right — but not far enough to turn right in front of it in order to miss the oncoming car in their lane. There was no time for that, anyway. Dick shouted, “Turn left! Turn left!” Mr. Billingsley had only a fraction of a second to turn partly to the left. There was not enough time to turn out of the way of the oncoming car. Two cars, for example, speeding toward one another at fifty miles an hour or more, seeing each other about 150 feet away, will crash into each other in less than one second! The oncoming car hit them head-on, its right side striking our men’s car slightly to the right of center, and Dick’s car crashed the oncoming car into the third car that our men were then passing. It was a three-car crash! But I didn’t wait for all these details then. I got the essential details, and I was off in a flash for San Luis Obispo. Dick had been unconscious, and taken in an ambulance to a hospital in San Luis Obispo. I had our switchboard telephone operator call our college physician, Dr. Ralph E. Merrill, asking him to be ready as I would be driving past his office in Glendale, on the way to San Luis Obispo. I asked Mr. Norman Smith, our radio studio manager, to go with me. Dr. Merrill was ready as we drove past. I drove as fast as I dared, consistent with safety. Right then I was terribly aware of the DANGER of highway driving, and although I wanted to make the fastest time possible, caution and care in driving came first. It was a strenuous drive of approximately 200 miles. Arriving at the hospital, we found that Dick had been transferred to another hospital — there were two hospitals in this little city. We found him now conscious, but in very critical condition. His right arm was broken at the elbow; his pelvis had been broken badly, and they had him in traction. His jaw had been broken in three or four places; X-rays showed that his heart had been knocked over to the right — to the middle or slightly right of the middle of his chest; his left lung had been collapsed. Mr. Billingsley had been examined, and released — not sufficiently injured to remain in the hospital. Dick wanted to rely on God for healing, without medical aid. The doctors asked for a conference with me and Dr. Merrill. They explained that Dick was already in their care and to protect their reputation and that of the hospital, they had to administer medical aid or else have him moved, in which case he probably would die before we could get him home. Dr. Merrill, who himself had been healed by direct prayer, and understood both sides of this problem, advised us against moving him in his very critical condition. The hospital doctors agreed to give him the very minimum of medical aid consistent with their own and the hospital’s protection. I learned later, however, that in practice that meant giving him everything “medicine” knew how to give. It was a very difficult decision to make — but with so many bones broken it certainly seemed that we would be directly causing his death to move him out of the traction and other trappings and contraptions that they had him in. Then followed one of the most tense, strenuous week’s vigil of my life. I telephoned my wife, and she with Lois, Dick’s wife, and their two and one half month old son came to San Luis Obispo on the train. Of course Mr. Smith and I had anointed and prayed for Dick immediately. It was a week of almost constant prayer. Registered nurses were required to be in constant attendance around the clock. We had one “R.N.” as they are called in hospitals, at the college and another had applied for entrance to Ambassador College that autumn. By telephone, I arranged for these two to come immediately to the hospital, and the hospital supplied the third nurse. We preferred to have our own nurses at his side so far as possible. It was too agonizing a week to go into in detail. Dr. Merrill had to return to Glendale, but the rest of us remained in the hotel in San Luis Obispo, to be in as constant attendance as possible. The accident occurred on July 23, 1958. By evening of July 29, a very serious decision had to be made. Dick’s kidneys were not functioning enough to keep him alive much longer. The doctors at San Luis Obispo had called specialists from UCLA Medical Center to come up for consultation. They told me that it would be necessary to attempt to remove Dick to the medical center in Westwood (Los Angeles) where they could use an artificial kidney to stimulate normal action by his own kidneys. By carrying him suspended in traction on the special kind of pallet “bed” that he was strapped on, driving slowly in an ambulance through the night, they felt that they could successfully move him to the Los Angeles medical center. Our two nurses and one or more of their doctors went along in the ambulance. Also, Mr. Norman Smith, who had remained the week with me, went along with them. We tried to get a little sleep through part of that night, rising and leaving about 5 a.m. for Los Angeles. We felt we should arrive not too much later than the ambulance, since it was to drive very slowly. During the week, Dick had had various ones of us read the Bible to him. In spite of the pain, and the terrible condition, he kept in good spirits. Once, in prayer, he began thanking God for the many, many blessings that had been lavished on him. The nurse in attendance said that this continued a long time — he had so very MANY things to be thankful for. I had typed out a number of biblical PROMISES that God had made for us, from various parts of the Bible, for our nurses to read to Dick in the ambulance when he was awake. As we approached the Los Angeles area on the morning of June 30, strange premonitions seemed to come into my mind. I didn’t tell the others. I didn’t want to cause them any concern, worry, or lack of faith. This I had to fight out within my own mind, by prayer and mental concentration. Finally, it seemed that I had won a victory over these premonitions and I had gotten my mind again into a state of FAITH. We drove into the UCLA Medical Center parking lot. We

left the others in the car while Lois and I went to see Dick or to get a report on his condition. As we approached the entrance, Mr. Smith and our two nurses approached us, with the news that just before they could get the artificial kidney connected, Dick had died. There were present some of the most famous surgeons and specialists in the nation. They cut Dick open near the heart and tried to massage his heart back into action — they tried frantically everything that such specialists know, but to no avail. Dick’s body was then sent to a mortuary in Pasadena. It hit Lois as if she had been shot. I grabbed her, steadied her. “Steady, Lois,” I said as calmly as I could. “Remember you have another very precious little life to nurse and keep alive, now. You must keep calm so that your milk will not be disturbed.” Lois responded bravely, like a “trouper.” Then we discussed how to break the news to Mrs. Armstrong. We tried to break it gently so it wouldn’t come as too much of a shock. We tried to keep normal composure. “They’ve taken Dick back to Pasadena,” I said, trying to be casual as if everything was OK. But no one ever could mislead my wife. She almost fainted — for she knew that we were only trying to ease the blow. But, she always was a real “trouper” too, and she quickly recovered without going to pieces — though naturally wounded to the very depths. . . .

IT was an agonizing week for Lois, his mother and me. No one, of course, but a mother, can describe or fully appreciate a mother’s love for her son. But fathers love their sons, too. And my affection for Richard David had been greatly deepened by the special circumstances under which he had been born.

My Time of Trial It is, of course, natural for every father to want a son. When our first child was a girl I was not disappointed. Few fathers would be. Nor was I disappointed when our second child was another daughter. But when the ranking most famous obstetrical specialist in the world, in a Chicago hospital pulling my wife through a near-fatal mid-pregnancy toxemia eclampsia, with 30 percent albumin in the urine, warned us gravely that she could never undergo another pregnancy without fatal results to her and the child, I was disappointed beyond words to describe. I had to resign myself to a sonless life. And this medical pronouncement was confirmed by two other doctors. We didn’t know, then. And I’m not sure these doctors knew, the real REASON. Apparently not too much was understood, at that time, by the medical profession about this negative-positive RH blood-factor condition. But my wife and I were opposites in that regard. I had been forced to resign myself to a future without possibility of ever having a son. Then, eight years later, in Portland, Oregon, Mrs. Armstrong had been — as recounted earlier — suddenly, completely healed of several serious complications by a positive miracle resulting from believing prayer. We knew then, by faith, that whatever had been the disturbing factor to render another pregnancy fatal, had been removed by this healing. I knew then that God would give me a son. And ever since I felt that the day Richard David was born was the happiest day of my life. I was perfectly satisfied, then. God had blessed me with a son. He had been conceived less than a year after my conversion. But the great God had plans I did not know. I was perfectly satisfied with the one son. We did not plan to have another. A year and four months later, Garner Ted was born — and I then felt doubly blessed — with TWO sons. But when God took from me — or allowed to be taken — my firstborn son, on July 30, 1958 — less than three months before his thirtieth birthday — well, it seemed that I could have some little understanding of how Abraham must have felt when he expected to have to give up his son Isaac — or even God the Father of all, in giving His Son Jesus Christ for ME as well as for the world.

The Ordeal Dick’s death occurred early Wednesday morning, July 30, 1958. The accident had occurred the preceding Wednesday morning. The funeral was set for Friday, August 1. The day in between, Thursday July 31, Mrs. Armstrong and I shared a very sorrowful 41st wedding anniversary. On Wednesday we conferred with Messrs. Roderick Meredith, Herman Hoeh and Norman Smith regarding funeral arrangements.

They felt unanimously that it was my duty to officiate at the funeral, which we planned for a simple graveside service only. Through the day I drove in my car to inspect cemeteries — which I had not had occasion to do before in Pasadena. I do not now remember whether Mrs. Armstrong and Lois went along. Necessary arrangements were completed. Lois accompanied us to the mortuary to select the casket — selecting one in the type of wood Lois said was Dick’s favorite. To say that my comparatively brief graveside sermon was an ordeal would be a gross understatement. I had learned, many years before, in conducting many funerals, to steel my nerves and remain calm, with controlled emotions. But speaking at Dick’s funeral was altogether different. I found myself speaking in a louder, more concentrated voice than usual in a supreme effort to prevent emotional loss of control. I remember quoting a portion of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, regarding the duty of those of us remaining to carry on the great work to which God had called us. My first impulse was to remain away from the Saturday afternoon college church service. I didn’t want to see anybody.

Nor did Mrs. Armstrong. But then I realized it was my duty to attend. I thought of entering at the last moment, and sitting in the front row before any could speak to me or offer condolences. But then I realized that some of the students had erroneously assumed that ministers were under such divine protection that no such tragedy could occur to one of them. Dick’s accident and death might shatter this faith. I knew I had to bring a message that would bolster and strengthen, not destroy, faith. These experiences were perhaps the most severe test I had ever been called on to experience. But of course I knew where to go for strength, wisdom, and help.

We Travel to Springfield Lois’ parents had come for the funeral. She and they planned for them to stay on a while with her, in the home she and Dick had purchased new just over a year before. Lois felt that perhaps, with her parents in the house, she might adjust to remaining there without Dick. I had assisted Dick and Lois with the down payment for the purchase of the property, and it probably was still less than half paid off. But Dick had been thoughtful in providing insurance which paid off the property in full. He also had provided insurance for Lois. And there was an additional $15,000 due Lois from group insurance carried by the College. However, the few days of attempts at adjusting to living in the house without Dick had convinced Lois, by that weekend, that she could not live there alone. Mrs. Armstrong, Lois and I planned a trip to get away from the trauma-shock we had undergone. I had learned that nothing is so quieting and relaxing to distraught nerves as a long trip on a train. So we planned a trip to Springfield, Missouri, to meet Ted and be with him for the final service of his evangelistic campaign. The death of Dick had caught Ted in a campaign he could not leave at the time. We left almost immediately, taking either the Chief, or the Super-Chief of the Santa Fe Railroad as far as Kansas City, changing there for a train to Springfield. Little Dicky — Richard David II — was carried in a sort of crib basket. It did Ted and his wife a great deal of good to have us with them in Springfield. He, too, had undergone a most severe ordeal. After a few days there, we journeyed on down to the location in Texas that later became the third campus of Ambassador College. We were then building there, of comparatively inexpensive all-steel construction, what we believed to be the largest “church auditorium” in Texas, as a tabernacle for an annual 8-day festival or convention — seating 8,000. After a day or two there, we journeyed on back to Pasadena. Soon we were engrossed in the many responsibilities of carrying on the work to which the living Christ had called us. We had, shortly before this, acquired the mansion of Mediterranean architectural design located between Mayfair (girls’ student residence), and Ambassador Hall. We had done a certain amount of remodelling to convert this property into another girls’ residence on campus — renamed Terrace Villa. Since Lois felt she could not endure living alone in the home she had shared for a year with Dick, we converted one wing of the ground floor of Terrace Villa into an apartment for her and little Dicky. This proved to be the best solution possible for Lois. She was on campus, where there was much activity. Many other girls were under the same roof, though she had the privacy of her own apartment. Also, she was abundantly supplied with “baby-sitters” whenever needed. Frequently, from that time, during the next few years, we all dreamed occasionally about Dick. It often seemed, in my dreams, as if he had come back from the dead and was living again — as indeed he shall — and in the not too distant future.

 If you are suspicious that Herbert Armstrong made this look and sound better than it was, with him as narcissistic hero at the center of it all, you are most wise.

My friend, who had been in Pasadena at the time, related to me last year what happened.

Alton Billingsly had been driving on the freeway with Richard David Armstrong as passenger. It was four lane divided highway, but work crews had diverted traffic so that it was two-way on a highway with only two lanes. Billingsly thought that he was still on the full freeway and drove in the left lane. When the car got to the top of the hill, it hit an automobile coming the opposite direction head-on. Richard David Armstrong was very seriously injured, but could have been saved if he had medical attention.

Now the way Herbert Armstrong tells the story is that Richard David Armstrong himself refused medical treatment because of the Radio Church of God beliefs. That is not the case. First, Alton Billingsly had told the paramedics that Richard could not have the treatment that would save his life because of church beliefs, and then Herbert Armstrong told the doctor the same thing. Herbert Armstrong made the ultimate decision. (This should be familiar to those who know the details behind the death of Loma Armstrong.)

There is also one other thing my friend told me that generally isn’t known.

Remember that my friend had been in Pasadena at the time. He was also in the home of Richard David Armstrong from time to time and knew him well.

Just prior to this accident leading to the death of an untreated Richard David Armstrong, he had warned his father, Herbert Armstrong concerning his corruption. Richard David Armstrong warned Herbert Armstrong to stop.

Now normally, this probably would not have fazed Herbert Armstrong in the slightest, but with the background of two perceived healings through Richard David Armstrong, such a warning would be problematic: Richard David Armstrong was well known, highly regarded, much loved and had credibility. He could have done real damage to his father.

Fate intervened, or rather, a careless driver did.

Now it is true that often we do not necessarily know our own motivations, particularly when self-interest is involved. No one could actually prove that Herbert Armstrong denied medical treatment to his own son to save his own worthless skin. It will remain a question. We do know that from that point, Herbert Armstrong “took off” and became much more corrupt, not just with lies and false prophecies but with his penchant for immorality and alcoholic behaviors: He was a very selfish man, totally narcissistic.

Sam Vaknin, self-acknowledged narcissist and perceived authority on narcissism, in his book,  Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited told us all that the prognosis for recovery is “poor and alarming”. He points out that narcissists are so self-absorbed that the whole universe is about them and there isn’t much hope to change from that perspective. There is no empathy for others: They are mere ciphers to be manipulated in ways that are advantageous to the narcissist.

If you will note from the Autobiography, Herbert Armstrong is more concerned about how he feels and what he’s going to do, more than he cares for others.

If you still aren’t convinced, then read this posting at Silenced about how Herbert Armstrong reacted to a suicide on Ambassador College Campus:

That was the last I saw of Jeff. Later that afternoon, we all arrived at a mandatory assembly in the gym, where it was announced that Jeff S. had committed suicide earlier that day by jumping off the Arroyo bridge — evidently just minutes after I had last seen him. The announcement was made — but it is what followed that was most troubling and revealing. The person doing the announcing of the suicide, who was a college administrator, took great pains to make sure everyone in attendance understood that Jeff’s parents did not blame the college, and that no one at the college was at fault. Then, after this terrible announcement and explanation, which took maybe 5 minutes, HWA got up front. Without the slightest acknowledgement of this terrible event, and without breaking stride, he launched into a tirade against all of those ministers who would dare question his authority. To HWA it was like a bake sale had been announced for the coming weekend. I will never forget the appalling atmosphere in that gym that day — students were crying because of Jeff S., and then HWA launches into his usual fit of anger.

As Cynthia G. commented on the post, RIP Dennis Jeffery Stephenson.

You may want to review the components of narcissism as given in our article,

How to be a Narcissistic Source Toady Suck-up:

Important Information to keep your relationship going!

So here we are: Joecamel says, HWA lives on inspite of your stupidity.  That is certainly the hope of those who want the return of Herbert Armstrong’s narcissism and all that it brings with it. Such people should have learned from his “descendants” of the various splinter nanocults of the Cult of Herbert Armstrong that it is not really desirable to have such people in charge. Robert Thiel is a good example of a bad example of what can happen when they have an entitlement thinking they are a prophet of God. People who encounter narcissists are totally drained mentally, emotionally, physically, spiritually and financially with absolutely no return on investment or positive results at all. Ronald Weinland is one of those who have drained his PKG members and is leaving them as he goes off to prison, without one shred of care about any of them. They were stupid dupes who gave him, his wife, his son and his daughter what he wanted and, in some cases, bankrupted them for his own selfish interests invested in a nice home, gold, jewelry, BMWs, travel, luxury accommodations, while spewing garbage being lapped up by his followers who are suffering personal loss as a result.

HWA lives on inspite of your stupidity.

Let’s hope not.

Herbert Armstrong is dead.

His legacy is not.

And Sam Vaknin, as a qualified expert on the subject, has a recommendation for those who encounter narcissists:


27 Replies to “News Flash: Herbert Armstrong is Dead!”

  1. “Herbert Armstrong is dead.

    His legacy is not.”

    One can conclude only that mammonism has served as the justification for the enslavement and servitude of entire families. Herbert was willing to dupe people into believing that the Germans and other peddlers of death would invade, enslave and rule over this country, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions is a bewildering paradox.

    What matters as to Armstrong is to realize that a man is known by the company he keeps. That’s why I would urge anyone to consider the Chaucerian panorama of fiends in Herbie’s shadow: sticky-fingered, uncouth firebrands, petty scammers, and unforgiving spivs, to name a few.

    To all those Armstrong ministers I have this to say. We’re all getting a little tired of you and your kind messing up the world and then refusing to accept responsibility for what you’ve done. We’re fed up. And the day is coming when you’ll be held accountable for your mentally deficient, parviscient holier-than-thou attitudes. At this point, our task is to bear witness to the painful, unvarnished truth.

    1. When will the sheep be held accountable for continuing to prop up these deluded fools? It’s the cultists that make the cult, not the leaders. The latter only appear in response to a demand for bullshit. Without that demand, all the bullshit providers would soon go the way of Armstrong, and the supply of bullshit would dry up. It’s the joecamels who are the problem. As has been amply demonstrated, they don’t even require that their leaders be alive–so long as they can keep turning over the bullshit and keep it fresh. If there were no Armstrongs, the joecamels would invent one. Where do you think it is that Armstrongs come from? The leaders are superfluous. The bullshit is paramount. And the sheep are to blame.

      1. Casey,

        Armstrongism is a microcosm of the world at large.
        Take politics. People keep voting the same sorry sacks of shit into office and the Armstrongist keeps parroting the time worn “the end is near” bullshit.

        Either way, politics or religion, the game is follow the leader.

        1. I think you missed my point. An appetite for bullshit is what’s wrong with pretty much everything in society, but it is particularly true with regard to cults. Why do you think it is that politicians have to play such games to stay in office? Because people must have their bullshit. If folks weren’t so gullible and such practiced bullshitters themselves, our political reality would be much more felicitous. Bullshit is in high demand, so that is what we get. You can’t blame the politicians for giving us so much bullshit. And, further, the bullshit scale is far from equitable between Left and Right. If you don’t know that, you might be a bullshitter yourself.

          1. Casey wrote:
            “You can’t blame the politicians for giving us so much bullshit.”

            Yes I can blame the bastard politicians. They don’t hurt just a few thousand of American citizens, but hundreds of millions.

            They lie, take your money and shit on you. Just like a cog. All these mother-fuckers want is a vote, and if they can buy your vote, they will.

            If this society paid attention to history they might realize that this course has been the same throughout history. And that is trusting individuals in society that claim to have answers to all.

            “And, further, the bullshit scale is far from equitable between Left and Right.”

            Politically speaking, America has been a one party system for the last 40 years. Sure, you have the lefties and those on the right. In the end you have the same sobs who take your rights, tax the shit out of you, and send your children to war for the sake of the empire.

            Where might we find the similarities between the cogs and the empire building USA?

            (Religious cults and American patriotism.)

            Question not.
            Blind obedience.


            “And, further, the bullshit scale is far from equitable between Left and Right. If you don’t know that, you might be a bullshitter yourself.”

            I am now a political atheist, to borrow a term from another and frankly don’t give a shit about either party. They are 2, yet they are 1. They are the same war mongering whores who send my children to an early death for the sake of the empire.

            Casey, in life a person is faced with many decisions, choices, and hardships. The one consistent that remains and stand out is that politicians, priests, and other psychopaths remain the dominant forces of not just American society, but the world stage.

            Think you have trouble in your life now? Wait another year.

              1. “I completely disagree with everything you’ve said here. I think it’s baseless and hyperbolic, i.e., bullshit.”

                Put your life into others hands and see what that buys you. Then live and learn like I did years ago.

                You may even ask Ralph about his run for congress under the libertarian party. Same sorry sack of manipulators seeking power.

  2. I remember the death of Dick Armstrong well. As a grade-school age boy, I’d come home one afternoon to see my mom crying, as she read the letter HWA had sent out notifying all of the church brethren of the accident. We were in an area at the time when church attendance was only possible on a very occasional basis, as the nearest services were about a 5-6 hour drive away. The fact is, probably Dick was dead by the time the letter was even delivered to our home. But, we didn’t know that until the second letter arrived about a week later. We did end up attending the F/T in the new steel building that fall, and I don’t recall them having dwelt on the accident or Dick’s death during the services.

    Clearly, the loss of such a son would be heart breaking to anyone, be they the nicest person on the face of the earth, or Charles Manson. I knew nothing of any corruption at that time, nor did we have any clue about this as AC students in 1966-68. Everything appeared at that time to be exactly what they told us it was. This has been a powerful lesson of life, because it illustrates the ways in which vital knowledge can be withheld or controlled, knowledge which forms the basis for important decisions which are made effecting life and well-being.

    Howard Clark was our speech teacher during Freshman Year. Although I had heard the stories of his healing at previous feasts, it had never occurred to me that they applied to our vibrant and energetic speech teacher. One wondered how he got away with being so outspoken, though. Years later, he left the group, and it seems it might have been during the first wave of dissidents leading up to 1975.

    We did indeed live in HWA’s prefab world! Especially if one happened to be an AC student, or to work for the college or church in Pasadena. He ruled the roost with a legendary temper that everyone assumed mirrored God’s own opinions of everything going on in our little community there. Normally, people would have automatically drawn certain conclusions about his demeanor, his managerial style, his ideas, his authoritarianism, but we were taught that such conclusions were of Satan, and had to be fought as part of our evil human nature. Talk about brain washing! What we were really doing was circumventing the human minds’ safety valves and preservation mechanisms!

    Way back in 1999-2,000 when I began, after decades of not even thinking about this topic, to re-examine all of these things, to attempt to learn, diffuse, and to make sense of it all, I had a kind of a secret fear that I’d repressed since 1975, and that was, what if by some stretch of the imagination, HWA had been right? I thought it remote, but it nagged enough that some reading, research, and work had to be done to put it all to bed once and for all. The fact that my parents were still in a splinter, along with one of my siblings and his family, apparently never having seen and realized the things which I had gave me long pause for thought. But, at this point, I’ve delved deeply into all of the aspects, read the info shared by knowledgeable others, and realize to the depths of my soul that HWA was a very toxic false teacher. Were this not the case, you could still make a very good case for the fact that his managerial style caused so much damage that it’s doubtful that a loving God would hold anyone responsible for rebelling against the ways in which things were taught. It’s doubtful that most of the people exposed to HWA will ever receive total healing of that damage in this lifetime!


  3. I was just looking at Casey and James responding to each other. The lesson of life is, don’t be a follower, period. I like Godel’s teorem in mathematics. A lot of people will tell you it has nothi ng to do with government or religion, but it does. Godel himself came from Austria and studied the constitution for US citizenship. He then proclaimed that US government was just as prone to dictatorship as the German government they were then fighting in WW2. The reason was that the judiciary branch was in charge of making decision s that could not be avoided by the general population. IOW, the government fell to the same flaw discovered by Godel in mathematics: self referencing systems.

    Madison, for example, poi nted out in “The Federalist” that any governent that com bined executive, legislative, and judiciary was the very definition of tyranny. When each system combines, the system is self referencing, and each branch looks to the other for justificatio n. The more a system depends on self reference, the less it is capable of discovering truth. The more the players in ea ch branch become dependent on the law for their livelihood, the less they are likely to hear the truth. Any religion capable of getting enough believers becomes self referencing. The members, like a hall of mirrors, look to each other to justify their actio ns. They also seek converts to convi nce them they do have the truth(Hoffer, “True Believer”). The system becomes closed, and corruption expands from narcissism.

    Again, this takes us directly to Matthew 24:23, to Romans 8:7, to isaiah 55:8, to Romans 8 and 9, to Ephesians 2:8-10, 1 Corinthians 1:27-29, etc.

    Religion and government depend on the same mechanical process for d ecision-making, and therefore they are both subject to exactly the same flaws. If you are an atheist regardin g government, you should be an atheist regarding religion. One declares the authority of God, one does not, but both are exactly the same, since they depend on human logic and reason for organizatio n. Casey, therefore, is correct, but so is James. Bullshit begets bullshit. Don’t believe any of them, and you are free.2Peter 2:19.

    1. Human logic and reason are all we’ve got, Ralph. You are making a false analogy between a representative democracy and a religion. Hoffer himself didn’t make that leap. To the extent that policy is decided (even if in the proximate) by reference to legitimately objective (i.e., external) institutions like science and activities like statistical analysis, a government is not subject to the same flaws as a religion–Godel’s unimpressive foible concerning the judiciary branch notwithstanding (and keep in mind that Godel was also fond of ontological arguments for theism).

  4. I have a news flash too.

    Jesus is dead!

    Jesus has been dead for nearly two thousand long years now!

    His promise to come back almost immediately, if any person called “Jesus” actually said those things (we can’t know because decades and centuries passed between the supposed statements and their written recording) was a lot of hot air. All the prognostications for his imminent coming today are also a lot of hot air.

    The cosmic Christ of all those people claiming to be “Paul” is likewise a lot of hot air and empty ink on the pages of a book called the Bible.

  5. Casey writes:

    “Human logic and reason are all we’ve got, Ralph. You are making a false analogy between a representative democracy and a religion. Hoffer himself didn’t make that leap. To the extent that policy is decided (even if in the proximate) by reference to legitimately objective (i.e., external) institutions like science and activities like statistical analysis, a government is not subject to the same flaws as a religion–Godel’s unimpressive foible concerning the judiciary branch notwithstanding (and keep in mind that Godel was also fond of ontological arguments for theism).”

    You just defeated your argument with the very first sentence. Since human logic and reason are all we have, whether wer use it in the dedication to religion or government, the results are essentially the same. Concludin g there is a difference is like asking if you would rather have Jello with whipped cream or without. It’s still Jello in either case. You’re merely deciding on taste. Whether Godel was fond of ontological arguments is a straw man. The fact is, his incompleteness theorem stands. Since you have ad mitted that logic and reason are the only tools we have, whether you apply form formal, axiomatic logic to religion or governme nt, you end with the same conclusion: there is no way to put all truth in one package.

    The only difference is that democracy merely assumes a majority can be right, whereas in religion, the majority assume one person is right. I had an 8th grade teacher who put doubt in my mind regarding religion, by poi nting out that our conscience cannot tel us right from wrong, but only tells us what our culture conditions us to believe is right or wrong. If so, then government is no improvement on religion, since both are created by people who cannot a bsolutely deterin e right or wrong.

  6. Allen writes:
    “Jesus is dead!

    Jesus has been dead for nearly two thousand long years now!

    His promise to come back almost immediately, if any person called “Jesus” actually said those things (we can’t know because decades and centuries passed between the supposed statements and their written recording) was a lot of hot air.”

    Your argument remains flawed, simply because jesus told us not to follow any man (Matthew 24:23) who said “here is Christ”. Further, si nce Romans 8:7 says the natural mind cannot be subject to God, and there is no evidence to show that it can, any religion from Jesus’ day to now would be unprovable and therefore wrong. As to whether Jesus is dead or not, or even if he ever existed, is still flawed, si nce he didn;t say anything that would force us to follow any ideology.

    ” All the prognostications for his imminent coming today are also a lot of hot air.

    Again, an irrelevant argument, since neither Jesus nor Paul ever declared that humans could organize in God’s name in the first place.

    “The cosmic Christ of all those people claiming to be “Paul” is likewise a lot of hot air and empty ink on the pages of a book called the Bible.”

    Again, flawed, since neither jesus nor Paul told us we could organize in God’s name in the first place.

    1. Ralph, I have no argument with you about the scriptures you keep bringing up which reminds me of the proof texting of Armstrongism.

      Where I’m coming from is that I don’t give a damn what Paul or anyone else supposedly wrote or said. I consider it all basically fiction and an exercise in futility. I’d just as soon argue about things stated in the Iliad, the Odyssey or the Bagavad Gita.

      It’s all arguing about fiction and delusion which I have long ago turned my back on and try as best I can to get others to see what an exercise in futility it all is.

      1. Al,

        For the believers here, scripture is quoted in order to make the point on a comment or article. The believers want proof using the bible as their only source of knowledge in the world, they get it.

        This is a new way of looking at the scriptures. Ralph has a way of looking at the writings of the bible in another light. His approach has been exceedingly more cognitive than the various Herbie wannabees who preach enslavement rather than enlightenment.

  7. BTW, Casey makes another point to be addressed:

    “Human logic and reason are all we’ve got, Ralph. You are making a false analogy between a representative democracy and a religion. Hoffer himself didn’t make that leap.”

    Actually Hoffer did make that leap, though he didn;t understand the underlying connection :

    “There is a certain uniformity in all types of dedication, od faith, of pursuit of power, of unity and of self sacrifice. There are vast differences in the contents of holy causes and doctrines, but a certain uniformity in the factors which make them effective.” Hoffer then goes on to question the motive of proselytizing, writing that it is “more of a passion ate search for something not yet found than a desire to bestow upon the world something we already have. it is a search for a final…demonstration that our absolute truth is indeed the one and o nly truth.”

    Richard Dawkins actually priovides the key to this urge in “The Selfish Gene”. The genes, says Dawkins, tends to replicate itself exactly, and in order to do so, will control its immediate environment as much as possible. Standardizatio n and u niformity, therefore, become the motives and drives that organize humai nity, whether of government or religion. Publishing and pri nt, via Gutenberg, intensified this because the mass pri nti ng of the ible placed new stress on standardized exact repeatability of the writtren word, whiole ignoring the actual contents of that word. When the Bible became available to the people, the result was literally blood in the street, as peple looked for the correct standard form of reproduction. Both religion and government are expressions of that intensity. We create both religion and government to extend our replicative control of our environment, and government “patriotism” will often replace the religious fervor. They are geerally interchangeale, as Allen Dexter seems to indicate. More interesting is that Paul points out in Ro mans 7 that we operate by a different “law” which is “warri ng in our members”, opposed to our conscious desires. Ja mes 4:1-2 indicates the same thing. Epigenetics show us that we are indeed the servomecha nisms of viral and bacterial DNA that has combined within us, and we are the mere extensions of “lusts” that war in our members. Government and religion are manifestations of that genetic replicativ expression.

  8. If US government today has taken a socialist turn, it is because businessmen have chosen the corporate model as the way to protect their investments. But corporeations are merely collectivist systems by which economic goals are maximized. That is, so-called free enterprise chose a socialist model to advance thweir goals, making it necessary dfor the people themselves to socialize as a reaction to collective control of corporations.

    I bega n to realize that the old WCG to which I belonged focused on being a better cog in the machine, being malleable for the corporation which employed me, and producing more for the glory of God. This is not all that different from mainstream religions. Corporatism fostered collectivism, and selected those religious impulses that drove us toward being better collective citizens. It is interestin g that “Big Business” gotr a bailout from the government, while co ntinuing to preach against the same collectivism practiced by citizens as a counter action against collectivist corporations. HWA was usefull to the collectivist corporate structure because he caused us to question our position in the mainstream, see ourselves as thinking individuals, and prepare ourselves as dedicated workers in the overall corporate system. The old Billy Graham movement that “saved souls” for the mindless labor of being cogs in the machine was no longer useful for a society moving away from factory and mill work. We learned to wear our suit and tie, speak intelligently in pulic, and be an example of cooperative goodness on our jobs.

  9. Taking Casey’s arguments a step further, su ch scriptures as Romans 7, James 4:1-2, Matthew 10:34-38, are actually statements consistent with evolution rather than religion. In James 4, for example, the “lusts that war in our flesh”, are now recognized as the struggle among our parasitic microorganisms, such as e coli and various bacteria for their own preservation. The virus, for example, perpetuates itself by cutting and pasting DNA across species and cannot do otherwise. Therefore, it affects behavior in order to spread itself. It is quite likely that such behavior also includes the desire for extension of self, which takes the form of proselytizing and narcissm, defined as the linear extension of one’s self into the environment.Pulitzer prize winning author Jonathan Weiner writes, in his study of genes and fruit flies, that we are a collection of genetic drives, all operating to replicate themselves while controlling their immediate environment, we are, therefore, a collection of “lusts that war in our members”. If ahuman is a gene’s way of making another gene, a million humans are extensio ns of that same “uniformity” that Hoffer mentions in my quote above. The drive for extension of self is basically the same, but the “contents” of the various justifications, as Hoffer points out, are all directed by the same general program. Jesus’ statement in Matthew 10:34-38, correspon ds to evolutiion, as Howard Bloom shows in his study of genes and humans, titled “Global Brain”:

    “Amo ng the Yanomammo, the biggest clashes are between family members–and between the groups they head. How could evolutioin favor feuds which current theory says should never be? Vreative bickering has been honed by natural selection, because in pitting father against son and brother against brother, it opens new avenues to genes, clans, cliques, and species. it slices through genetic bonds and generates diversity”.

    This is essentially why Matthew 10:34-38 is an evolutionary statement and not a religious statement. Assuming Romans 8:7 is correct, and there’s no reason not to, the result of intense application of “God’s law” will result in exactly the kind of diversity we see in the various COGs, exactly as intended.

    Since the genetic urge is the force driving narcissistic extension of self into the environment, it logically follows that “God’s law” would serve to create the opposite result: continual splintering and speciation of beliefs and religions, as Jesus points out. AND, assuming that there is a God who is a lawgiver, it would negate the whole process if God could be proven, and that we could simply wait on him to tell us what to do. Government and religion are merely the flawed extension of the genetic drive for replication.

  10. Ralph,

    “If US government today has taken a socialist turn, it is because businessmen have chosen the corporate model as the way to protect their investments.”
    Yes. We call it fascist. Marriage of State and corporation.

    As you and I both touched on this before, the WCG was a collective with a supreme rubber stamp corporate board. The dictator HWA made pronouncements and the church press put forth the decree towards the collective workers. Us.


    “In James 4, for example, the “lusts that war in our flesh”, are now recognized as the struggle among our parasitic microorganisms, such as e coli and various bacteria for their own preservation.”

    If the folks here don’t have the level of knowledge as to biology, this is lost on them. I believe you might be better off making your point sticking with Godel’s incompleteness theorems.

  11. Yes, the marriage of corporation with government is fascism. It’s interesting that neoconservative supporters of “free enterprise” choose to selectively ignore that fact. When the producers choose fascism, the people tend toward socialism. HWA was a gand example of such marriage, as you point out, but all religions that run to government for tax exempt status play the same game.
    James writes:

    “If the folks here don’t have the level of knowledge as to biology, this is lost on them. I believe you might be better off making your point sticking with Godel’s incompleteness theorems.”

    Yes, but there is the hope that a few can grasp it sufficiently to realize that such scriptures as James 4:1-2 do not actually say we are directly responsible for our choices, but in fact we unconsciously serve a “fleshy master”. Romans 7 also provides a good discussion of this. You wil notice in Paul’s reasonings starting in Romans 7 and running through Romans 9 state that we can’t simply will ourselves to be “good”, and in Romans 8:7 points out that basic human logic and reason are not sufficient to cause “righteous” behavior. Placed in the modoern perspective of biology and epigenetics, James and Paul produce a system of thought exactly opposite of what professing christians assume, in regard to “free will” and God.

  12. Allen writes:
    “Ralph, I have no argument with you about the scriptures you keep bringing up which reminds me of the proof texting of Armstrongism.”

    Actually your argument is merely straw man. If i were trying to use any scripture to prove that which cannot be shown to be logically correct, it would merely be proof texting or argument from authority to prove an authority that doesn’t exist. Since yo obviously can’t answer it to prove it wrong, it is obviously correct. Can I prove it correct, or ca n I prove it is falsifiable? Of course, if it is wrong, you ony need to prove that there IS an authority to represent Christ, in which one can believe, but you’ve already said you can’t and don’t wish to. Therefore your conclusion is incorrect. The state ment itself is true, whether you accept it as true or not. To compare it as proof texting as in Armstro ngism is merely to use a straw man as justification.

    “Where I’m coming from is that I don’t give a damn what Paul or anyone else supposedly wrote or said. I consider it all basically fiction and an exercise in futility. I’d just as soon argue about things stated in the Iliad, the Odyssey or the Bagavad Gita.”

    Except for the fact that you’re offensi ve to those of us who do, such as e, who will demand that you proive your point. As long as you make an unfounded statement , I will challenge it, whether you give a damn or not.

    “It’s all arguing about fiction and delusion which I have long ago turned my back on and try as best I can to get others to see what an exercise in futility it all is.”

    Again, an unfounded statement. It’s fiction only if you can prove it’s fiction, and I have offered extensive points to show that my arguments are correct. You have merely shown opinion.

  13. “Again, an unfounded statement. It’s fiction only if you can prove it’s fiction, and I have offered extensive points to show that my arguments are correct. You have merely shown opinion.”


    I think that Al’s response was his “opinion” and not meant as a final analysis. That is why I am an agnostic, as I can’t prove it but can’t discount the mathematical possibility of a god existing. (external from mans concept type of god).

  14. Of course, but he also added that he was trying to co nvince others of that opinion. If one tries to spread an unfalsifiable opinion, wh woud he be any different from HWA? Shoud one follow the Socratic method of following truth where it is to be found? If it is an opinion, state it as such. But what is church and state if not a collective opinion?

  15. HWA is dead and so we all will be. If any of you so called
    intelligent gurus out there know how to talk his way out of the grave post the DIY manual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
5 − 1 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.