The survival of the species depends on the establishment of an IQcracy, a Platonic Republic of the Intellect. At the top, serving as leaders and decision-makers, would be people with 150 IQ and higher. A soaring Intelligence Quotient (IQ), by itself, is insufficient, of course. Members of this elite of “philosopher-kings” would also have to be possessed with a high emotional quotient (EQ) and sound mental health.
The next rung in the social ladder would be comprised of those with an IQ of between 100 and 150. They will form and constitute the managerial, bureaucratic, scientific, and entrepreneurial classes. People with IQs between 80 and 100 will replenish the blue-collar skilled and trained working classes. Unfortunates with less than 80 IQ will be confined to simple, repetitive menial jobs. They will be barred from voting.
Why such drastic measures? Because Humanity is under imminent threat of being overrun by idiots, diluted by imbeciles, and submerged by a tidal wave of retardation. We often confuse technology with culture and civilization with progress. Nazi Germany is proof that such reflexive linkages are spurious. In truth, we have become Barbarians with iPads: we use the latest innovations to play Angry Birds and watch inane videos on YouTube and exchange trivialities on Facebook.
Traits are not desirable or undesirable in themselves. They are advantageous (adaptive) or detrimental, depending on the environment.
Why would women prefer men with an IQ lower than 120 to men with an IQ higher than 145? These are the results of a study published last year.
The answer is simple:
Our contemporary world is ruled by the feebleminded, dimwits are empowered by technology, and everything is dumbed down to foster mass consumption.
In such a world, lower intelligence is a positive adaptation which confers evolutionary advantages on its bearers – and on their spouses and offspring.
Women select for beta males because the current environment favors beta traits over alpha traits.
It is a paradigm shift of mind-bending proportions (for those in possession of a mind).
A study of nine million young adults over 40 years (conducted by Jean Twenge and her colleagues and published in the March 2012 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) has starkly demonstrated the deterioration from one generation to another. Youngsters are now focused on money, image, and fame and disparage values such as community, volunteerism, the environment, and knowledge acquisition. Other surveys have documented a rising level of illiteracy. As if to illustrate the imminence of these new Dark Ages, the Encyclopedia Britannica announced that it will cease the publication of its print edition after 244 years. Its surviving digital editions are a far cry from the print equivalent in terms of depth, length, and erudition.
The Stupid, the Trivial, and the Frivolous are everywhere: among the working classes, of course, but increasingly you can find them displacing the erstwhile elites, spawning hordes of mindless politicians, idiot business tycoons, narcissistic media personalities, gullible clergy, vacuous celebrities, illiterate bestselling authors, athletes with far more brawn than brain, repetitious pop singers, less than mediocre bureaucrats, bovine gatekeepers, and even ignorant and semi-literate academics. Their cacophony drowns the few voices of wisdom, expertise, and experience and their sheer number overwhelms all systems of governance and all mechanisms of decision-making. Rather than futilely fight back this tsunami, the well-educated, the erudite, and the intelligent choose to withdraw and seclude themselves in self-constructed, schizoid ivory towers, all bridges drawn.
Imbeciles are a menace to the continued existence not only of our civilization, but also of our species. We may end up being all Homo, no sapiens.
The percentage of stupid people in the general populace may not have changed. It may even have decreased. But in terms of absolute numbers, there are more Stupid heads now than the entire human population only a century ago. Modern medicine makes sure that the retarded and plain dim-witted live on to a ripe old age. That we are faced with the daunting prospect of idiocracy is the fault of the malignant transformation of the democratic ideal and the recent onslaught of the media, both old and new.
Start with democracy, the Stupid People’s pernicious answer to meritocracy:
In the not-too-distant past dim-witted people had the right to vote once in a while and thus express their completely inconsequential opinion where it mattered least: in the ballot box. Alas, the inane idea of “one person (never mind how pinheaded, unqualified, or ignorant), one vote” has invaded and permeated hitherto hierarchical environments such as government, the workplace, and the military. With technology at their disposal, The Stupid repeatedly interfere with and disrupt the proper functioning of virtually every system.
Even the generation and transfer of knowledge have been “democratized” as crowdsourcing yielded enterprises such as Wikipedia, the “encyclopedia” that anyone can edit, add to, and delete from. Internet search engines rank results not according to the merits and authority of the content, but by the number of votes cast by … you guessed it: mostly dense people (who now congregate on social networks). This widespread and much-lauded vandalism reflects the utter collapse and disintegration of the education system which turns out illiterate, nescient, and irrational graduates having annihilated its standards in order to lucratively embrace them as students in the first place.
The Stupid, dimly aware of their innate inferiority, are anti-elitist, anti-intellectual, and anti-excellence. But, while in the past these remained mere sentiments, today they have become an ethos, a code of conduct, a set of values and ideals. It is politically incorrect and impolite to claim any advantage and superiority. Egalitarianism is running amok. Everyone is equal: doctors and their patients; professors and their students; experts and laymen alike.
Continue with technology:
In an act of self-preservation, past civilizations had confined The Stupid to certain settlements, replete with their drinking establishments, entertainments, and sports arenas. There the “intellectually-challenged” could safely torment each other with their vulgarities and rampant, uninformed idiocy. The advent of radio, television, and, most egregiously, the Internet has changed all that: now stupid people have unmitigated access to the kind of technology that allows them to pollute the airwaves and the broadband with their inferior analytic capacity, low-brow output, trivial observations, monosyllabic exclamations, and harebrained queries. Thus, the New Media have transformed stupidity from a mental endemic to a viral pandemic. The wise and knowledgeable may broadcast while the Stupid merely narrowcast – but the Stupid have the upper hand, what with Google, Facebook, Twitter, Blogger, Amazon, and YouTube decimating the traditional print and electronic media.
This technological empowerment is the crux of the problem: there are no barriers to entry, no institutional filters, and no erudite and experienced intermediaries to hold back the avalanche of doltish balderdash, the tsunami of nonsense, and the flood of misinformation, factoids, and conspiracies that corrupt our intellectual space. “Discovery”: separating the wheat from the chaff has become mission impossible. Commercial interests inevitably and invariably side with the brainless masses because of their superior aggregate purchasing power. The privatization of education is one manifestation of this creeping decadence. The mindless nature of television programming is another. The empty one-liners that comprise most “conversations” on social networks are its culmination. We are surrounded with clods, harassed by the lame-brained, criticized, censored, and ordered by simpletons. Welcome to the New Dark Ages.
Authored by Sam Vaknin, June 11, 2011. “Blogging the Apocalypse”
Which would you prefer: A brilliant sophisticated psychopath with a high I.Q. or a good solid person with average (or slightly below) who is friendly, loyal and has integrity?
The question may not be as much about intelligence as it is about being consistent, honest, trustworthy and doing things in a sensible and reasonable manner with care and attention to detail.
In other words, it boils down to who you can actually trust? Who is going to get the job done right? Who can you trust with your stuff?
Haven’t we all had it up to here with snarky demeaning dismissive careless narcissists?
Personally, I would rather know and associate with a solid blue collar worker, mechanic, engineer of solid reputation and scientist / researcher who actually accepts objective truth than the elite ‘journalist’ filled with hubris that lies and promotes liberal wrong opinions as (fake) news.
Of course it’s nice to have the benefit of being smart and being around smart people as long as it is beneficial to everyone. The problem with I.Q. tests is that they often do not reflect some very real and important characteristics without which a person is functionally worthless.
It’s like someone said about a brilliant but erratic network engineer with the propensity of installing updates which failed: We sure wish he was half as smart and twice as careful.
I WOULD RATHER BE AMONG THOSE WITH INTEGRITY.
In the article, on display, are the results of liberalism in my opinion. Dumbing down the masses in order to control all aspects of their lives.
I can’t agree with putting the rich in places they should not be, but this world had always been ‘managed’ one way or another. Who will run the country in a generation or two? Damned scary thought.
Ok, here is the next generation and how they work.
The ideas espoused by Dr. Sam Vaknin seem straight out of “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, where everyone was “engineered” to have a rather niche place in the world. Savage shows up and tries to integrate and understand this “Brave New World” and ends up committing suicide (I know, the movie has a different ending).
The social order of identity politics as it is now developing simply can’t have any sort of future because it violates the fundamental law of the universe: You can’t get something for nothing. Yet, certain segments of society keep saying magic words to influence people and to convince them that they can indeed influence and change the world — to their own vision.
This is cult thinking, pure and simple. It doesn’t matter if it is Herbert Armstrong, David Miscavige or Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer claims things are different than they are, they simply can’t change objective evidence nor can they successfully reject science without consequences.
There comes a bottom line when it comes to pay up and eventually every person and every cult faces the bill — it can’t be avoided. Entropy is reality. You can’t just shuffle things around and burn ashes. Eventually, you either get resources from somewhere else (often by outright strong-armed theft) or you go bankrupt.
The only way to solve problems is to apply the proper energies and procedures to counter them. Sometimes, that’s not enough. Sometimes there is no viable solution and systems fail.
“Who will run the country in a generation or two? Damned scary thought.” Don’t think of it as a generation or two. Things have escalated so quickly in the past 3 years that we need to think in terms of either 2021 or 2025 — or a range in between. It well may be a luxury to think in terms of a generation.
I am glad that there are those like Joshua Fluke speaking out on what is happening in corporatism. People like him are sort of the last bastion of the uphill battle to retain some semblance of sanity.