“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”
âI donât need invitations by the state, state mayors, or state governors, to do our job. Weâre going to do that, whether they like us there or not.ââActing Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolfâs defense of the Trump Administrationâs deployment of militarized federal police to address civil unrest in the states
This is a wake-up call.
What is unfolding before our very eyesâwith police agencies defying local governments in order to tap into the power of federal militarized troops in order to put down domestic unrestâcould very quickly snowball into an act of aggression against the states, a coup by armed, militarized agents of the federal government.
At a minimum, this is an attack on the Tenth Amendment, which affirms the sovereignty of the states and the citizenry, and the right of the states to stand as a bulwark against overreach and power grabs by the federal government.
If youâre still deluding yourself into believing that this thinly-veiled exercise in martial law is anything other than an attempt to bulldoze what remains of the Constitution and reinforce the iron-fisted rule of the police state, you need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
This is no longer about partisan politics or civil unrest or even authoritarian impulses.
This is a turning point.
Unless we take back the reinsâand soonâlooking back on this time years from now, historians may well point to the events of 2020 as the death blow to Americaâs short-lived experiment in self-government.
The governmentâs recent actions in Portland, Oregonâwhen unidentified federal agents (believed to be border police, ICE and DHS agents), wearing military fatigues with patches that just say âPoliceâ and sporting all kinds of weapons, descended uninvited on the city in unmarked vehicles, snatching protesters off the streets and detaining them without formally arresting them or offering any explanation of why theyâre being heldâis just a foretaste of whatâs to come.
One of those detainees was a 53-year-old disabled Navy veteran who was in downtown Portland during the protests but not a participant. Concerned about the tactics being used by government agents who had taken an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution, Christopher David tried to speak the âsecretâ police. Almost immediately, he was assaulted by federal agents, beaten with batons and pepper sprayed
Another peaceful protester was reportedly shot in the head with an impact weapon by this federal goon squad.
The Trump Administration has already announced its plans to deploy these border patrol agents to other cities across the country (Chicago is supposedly next) in an apparent bid to put down civil unrest. Yet the overriding concerns by state and local government officials to Trumpâs plans suggest that weaponizing the DHS as an occupying army will only provoke more violence and unrest.
Weâve been set up.
Under the guise of protecting federal properties against civil unrest, the Trump Administration has formed a task force of secret agents who look, dress and act like military stormtroopers on a raid and have been empowered to roam cities in unmarked vehicles, snatching citizens off the streets, whether or not theyâve been engaged in illegal activities.
As the Guardian reports, âThe incidents being described sound eerily reminiscent of the CIAâs post-9/11 rendition program under George W Bush, where intelligence agents would roll up in unmarked vans in foreign countries, blindfold terrorism suspects (many of whom turned to be innocent) and kidnap them without explanation. Only instead of occurring on the streets of Italy or the Middle East, itâs happening in downtown Portland.â
The so-called racial justice activists who have made looting, violence, vandalism and intimidation tactics the hallmarks of their protests have played right into the governmentâs hands
They have delivered all of us into the police stateâs hands.
Thereâs a reason Trump has tapped the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for this dirty business: these agencies are notorious for their lawlessness, routinely sidestepping the Constitution and trampling on the rights of anyone who gets in their way, including legal citizens.
Indeed, it was only a matter of time before these roving bands of border patrol agents began flexing their muscles far beyond the nationâs borders and exercising their right to disregard the Constitution at every turn.
Except these border patrol cops arenât just disregarding the Constitution.
Theyâre trampling all over the Constitution, especially the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits the government from carrying out egregious warrantless searches and seizures without probable cause.
As part of the governmentâs so-called crackdown on illegal immigration, drugs and trafficking, its border patrol cops have been expanding their reach, roaming further afield and subjecting greater numbers of Americans to warrantless searches, ID checkpoints, transportation checks, and even surveillance on private property far beyond the boundaries of the borderlands.
That so-called border, once a thin borderline, has become an ever-thickening band spreading deeper and deeper inside the country.
Now, with this latest salvo by the Trump administration in its so-called crackdown on rioting and civil unrest, America itself is about to become a Constitution-free zone where freedom is off-limits and government agents have all the power and âwe the peopleâ have none.
The Customs and Border Protection (CBP), with its more than 60,000 employees, supplemented by the National Guard and the U.S. military, is an arm of the Department of Homeland Security, a national police force imbued with all the brutality, ineptitude and corruption such a role implies.
As journalist Todd Miller explains:
In these vast domains, Homeland Security authorities can institute roving patrols with broad, extra-constitutional powers backed by national security, immigration enforcement and drug interdiction mandates. There, the Border Patrol can set up traffic checkpoints and fly surveillance drones overhead with high-powered cameras and radar that can track your movements. Within twenty-five miles of the international boundary, CBP agents can enter a personâs private property without a warrant.
Just about every nefarious deed, tactic or thuggish policy advanced by the government today can be traced back to the DHS, its police state mindset, and the billions of dollars it distributes to local police agencies in the form of grants to transform them into extensions of the military.
As Miller points out, the government has turned the nationâs expanding border regions into âa ripe place to experiment with tearing apart the Constitution, a place where not just undocumented border-crossers, but millions of borderland residents have become the targets of continual surveillance.â
In much the same way that police across the country have been schooled in the art of sidestepping the Constitution, border cops have also been drilled in the art of âanything goesâ in the name of national security.
In fact, according to FOIA documents shared with The Intercept, border cops even have a checklist of âpossible behaviorsâ that warrant overriding the Constitution and subjecting individualsâincluding American citizensâto stops, searches, seizures, interrogations and even arrests.
For instance, if youâre driving a vehicle that to a border cop looks unusual in some way, you can be stopped. If your passengers look dirty or unusual, you can be stopped. If you or your passengers avoid looking at a cop, you can be stopped. If you or your passengers look too long at a cop, you can be stopped.
If youâre anywhere near a border (near being within 100 miles of a border, or in a city, or on a bus, or at an airport), you can be stopped and asked to prove youâre legally allowed to be in the country. If youâre traveling on a public road that smugglers and other criminals may have traveled, you can be stopped.
If youâre not driving in the same direction as other cars, you can be stopped. If you appear to be avoiding a police checkpoint, you can be stopped. If your car appears to be weighed down, you can be stopped. If your vehicle is from out of town, wherever that might be, you can be stopped. If youâre driving a make of car that criminal-types have also driven, you can be stopped.
If your car appears to have been altered or modified, you can be stopped. If the cargo area in your vehicle is covered, you can be stopped.
If youâre driving during a time of day or night that border cops find suspicious, you can be stopped. If youâre driving when border cops are changing shifts, you can be stopped. If youâre driving in a motorcade or with another vehicle, you can be stopped. If your car appears dusty, you can be stopped.
If people with you are trying to avoid being seen, or exhibiting âunusualâ behavior, you can be stopped. If you slow down after seeing a cop, you can be stopped.
In Portland, which is 400 miles from the border, protesters didnât even have to be near federal buildings to be targeted. Some claimed to be targeted for simply wearing black clothing in the area of the demonstration.
Are you starting to get the picture yet?
This was never about illegal aliens and border crossings at all. Itâs been a test to see how far âwe the peopleâ will allow the government to push the limits of the Constitution.
Weâve been failing this particular test for a long time now.
It was 1798 when Americans, their fears stoked by rumblings of a Quasi-War with France, failed to protest the Alien and Sedition Acts, which criminalized anti-government speech, empowered the government to deport âdangerousâ non-citizens and made it harder for immigrants to vote.
During the Civil War, Americans went along when Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus (the right to a speedy trial) and authorized government officials to spy on Americansâ mail.
During World War I, Americans took it in stride when President Woodrow Wilson and Congress adopted the Espionage and Sedition Acts, which made it a crime to interfere with the war effort and criminalized any speech critical of war.
By World War II, Americans were marching in lockstep with the governmentâs expanding war powers to imprison Japanese-American citizens in detainment camps, censor mail, and lay the groundwork for the future surveillance state.
Fast-forward to the Cold Warâs Red Scares, the McCarthy eraâs hearings on un-American activities, and the governmentâs surveillance of Civil Rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr.âall done in the name of national security.
By the time 9/11 rolled around, all George W. Bush had to do was claim the country was being invaded by terrorists, and the government was given greater powers to spy, search, detain and arrest American citizens in order to keep America safe.
The terrorist invasion never really happened, but the government kept its newly acquired police powers made possible by the nefarious USA Patriot Act.
Barack Obama continued Bushâs trend of undermining the Constitution, going so far as to give the military the power to strip Americans of their constitutional rights, label them extremists, and detain them indefinitely without trial, all in the name of keeping America safe.
Despite the fact that the breadth of the militaryâs power to detain American citizens violates not only U.S. law and the Constitution but also international laws, the government has refused to relinquish its detention powers made possible by the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
Then Donald Trump took office, claiming the country was being invaded by dangerous immigrants and insisting that the only way to keep America safe was to build an expensive border wall, expand the reach of border patrol, and empower the military to âassistâ with border control.
That so-called immigration crisis has now morphed into multiple crises (domestic extremism, the COVID-19 pandemic, race wars, civil unrest, etc.) that the government is eager to use in order to expand its powers.
Yet as weâve learned the hard way, once the government acquiresâand usesâadditional powers (to spy on its citizens, to carry out surveillance, to transform its police forces into extensions of the police, to seize taxpayer funds, to wage endless wars, to censor and silence dissidents, to identify potential troublemakers, to detain citizens without due process), it does not voluntarily relinquish them
This is the slippery slope on which weâve been traveling for far too long.
As Yale historian Timothy Snyder explains, âThis is a classic way that violence happens in authoritarian regimes, whether itâs Francoâs Spain or whether itâs the Russian Empire. The people who are getting used to committing violence on the border are then brought in to commit violence against people in the interior.â
Sure, itâs the Trump Administration calling the shots right now, but itâs government agents armed with totalitarian powers and beholden to the bureaucratic Deep State who are carrying out these orders in defiance of the U.S. Constitution and all it represents.
Whether itâs Trump or Biden or someone else altogether, this year or a dozen years from now, the damage has been done: as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we have allowed the president to acquire dictatorial powers that can be unleashed at any moment.
Thereâs a reason the Trump Administration is consulting with John Yoo, the Bush-era attorney notorious for justifying waterboarding torture tactics against detainees. Theyâre not looking to understand how to follow the law and abide by the Constitution. Rather, theyâre desperately seeking ways to thwart the Constitution.
As Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe recognizes, âThe dictatorial hunger for power is insatiable.
This is how it begins.
This is how it always begins.
Donât be fooled into thinking any of this will change when the next election rolls around.
WC: 2265
ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People is available at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected].
Would Mr. Whitehead prefer UN or NATO troops to restore Law & Order and protect federal property in America instead? What is the oath taken by DHS civil servants?
I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. 5 U.S.C. § 3331
“The Oaths are relatively straightforward, but what do they mean? I see the oath as having 3 important aspects. First, the employee swears to support and defend the Constitution against enemies. Second, they swear allegiance to the Constitution. Finally, the employee promises to do their job well.
One thing that federal workers often hear is a career supervisor or political appointee talking about loyalty to the agency or the boss. One purpose of the Oath of Office is to remind federal workers that they do not swear allegiance to a supervisor, an agency, a political appointee, or even to the President. The oath is to support and defend the U.S. Constitution and faithfully execute your duties. The intent is to protect the public from a government that might fall victim to political whims and to provide a North Star â the Constitution â as a source of direction. Other laws have been enacted that support that view. For example, in 1939, Congress passed and President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Hatch Act. We call it that today, but the actual name of the law is âAn Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities.â” Source
What is unfolding before our eyes is the dereliction of duty by mostly democratic politicians. They are allowing ANTIFA and BLM thugs to sow chaos by looting, rioting, vandalizing, and committing arson on private, state, and federal property. They hide behind the shield of social-justice-warrior, but their aim is Marxism and the changing of the Constitution. I don’t care so much about the statues and monuments. Those don’t effect commerce and the run of business. Let’s not forget the roadblocks and aggression towards anybody else who might have a different opinion than the so-called “peacful protesters”. I’ve seen so much live footage that I am shocked at the naivety of some people. Their decisions to “stand down” the police and then to defund them has allowed the chaos to flourish. It’s not chaos but more accurately an insurrection. What about us, the citizens, and Law & Order? Do we resort to vigilantism? Should the UN or NATO get involved? Is the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020, H.R.7120, a Trojan Horse? Why not have citizens, be they retired or not, police or federal agents who have already taken the oath of office? Perhaps AG Barr’s testimony today before the House Judiciary Committee will give us more answers.
We are under assault by FEAR(covid19/medical martial law) and MORAL PANIC(systemic racism/defund the police). This is the turning point. The deep-state is actively undermining Law & Order in America to prevent Justice from taking place. If the corruption in our government goes unpunished and is instead allowed to continue unabated, that is what will be the undoing of America. Don’t be fooled that this election really doesn’t matter. A free America or the Strongman for Globalism.
Let the cities burn is the solution. Hold the politicians of the state be held responsible come election day. Actually the politicians could be held personally responsible for the carnage. I quoted it here before, “Deprivation of rights under color of law.” I am sure there is another that fits this situation even more.
Is the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020, H.R.7120, a Trojan Horse? Yes.
President Trump exercised restraint and only sent well identified Federal Police to preserve Federal Property when domestic terrorists went to smash and burn down courthouses and other federal property.
John W. Whitehead is a progressive liar spinning a tale of fantasy to distract people from the rioters, looting, violence — in some case murders — and destruction of property.
President Trump is letting the cities burn otherwise. It’s the states’ rights after all, if they choose to allow civilization fall within their own provinces.
It’s an opportunity though. You might mingle with the rioters to burn down a Federal Court House and you know, you might just meet the mayor of the city helping out the ‘peaceful protesters’.