The national debt recently blew past $32 trillion.
As we approach Americaâs birthday on July 4, it might be a good time to consider what the founding fathers would have thought about this massive indebtedness.
James Madison might have summed it up best when he called a national debt âa national curse.â
I go on the principle that a Public Debt is a Public curse and in a Rep. Govt. a greater than in any other.â
The antifederalist writer Brutus made a similar point, writing.
 I can scarcely contemplate a greater calamity that could befall this country, than to be loaded with a debt exceeding their ability ever to discharge.â
Thomas Jefferson said he considered âpublic debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared,â and he warned that in order to preserve the peopleâs independence, âwe must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.â
He also talked about the urgency of paying off debts, saying it would help preserve peace.
It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which, if acted on, would save one half the wars of the worldâ
Jefferson went on to explain just what would happen if we failed to heed his warning.
If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries & our comforts, in our labors & our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor 16 hours in the 24 give the earnings of 15 of these to the government for their debts and daily expences; and the 16th being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal & potatoes.â
Benjamin Franklin warned that running into debt gives âto another Power over your Liberty.â
Madison shared Franklinâs view, naming debt among a trio of tools that people with power use to establish tyranny.
Armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.â [Emphasis added]
In his Farewell Address, George Washington urged the country to use debt sparingly and pay it off as quickly as possible.
As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it.â
He made a similar point in his Fifth Annual Message to Congress.
No pecuniary consideration is more urgent than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt. On none can delay be more injurious or an economy of time more valuable.â
Jefferson gave us a blueprint for how to handle the debt.
I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple, applying all the possible savings of the public revenue to the discharge of the national debt and not for a multiplication of officers & salaries merely to make partizans, & for increasing, by every device, the public debt, on the principle of itâs being a public blessing.â [Emphasis added]
For many in the founding generation, loading future generations with debt was morally unacceptable and something that should be rejected. Washington referred to it as âungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear.â
Jefferson agreed, writing to John Taylor that âthe principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.â
A $32 trillion national debt is just another example of how far America has drifted from its founding principles.
As Norm Franz once noted: “Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants, but debt is the money of slaves.” A twist on this astute quote I’ve seen online of late is “digital” replacing the word “debt,” but of course nowadays they’re virtually the same thing.
Interestingly Jefferson once lamented: “I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution. I would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of our government; I mean an additional article taking from the Federal Government the power of borrowing.” We can only imagine how better off Americans would’ve been if such an amendment had passed!
“I mean an additional article taking from the Federal Government the power of borrowing.â
Yep. There would not be a industrial war machine that along with social programs that are bankrupting the country.
Moreover, think of how much better we all would be off if there were no income tax or property taxes (including inheritance tax).
Government would have to be smaller and the temptation of the spendthrifts would be greatly reduced as they would not have access to obscene amounts of money to spend on frivolous things.
Beyond that, think of how much sanity that would bring. We’ve all seen how absolutely crazy Herbert Armstrong was with the billions slipping through his hands, spending on foolish and impractical things to make himself feel better in his depression and mania. Billionaires are not as sane as you might think and neither are large governments and corporations that have access to huge amounts of cash.